The most significant topic of discussion was the proposed 50% increase in pool membership fees. The council debated the necessity of the hike to ensure the pool’s financial sustainability amid rising operational costs, including wages and chemicals. A council member pointed out that previous low rates and a lack of a robust rate-making process had compounded these challenges.

Public commentary played a role in the discussion, with residents voicing contrasting opinions. One resident urged the council to reconsider restricting pool access to only Verona residents. There was also mention of the possibility of expanding membership options to municipal employees residing outside Verona.

Another resident emphasized the need for transparency in the pool’s funding model, clarifying that the pool is now sustained entirely by membership fees, countering misinformation about taxpayer funding. The council acknowledged the necessity of clear communication regarding fee structures and the pool’s financial expectations, citing insights from a New Gen study on potential membership losses associated with fee increases.

The council deliberated on the implications of increased fees on community participation, with concerns that higher rates might deter potential members. Discussions included the need for an overview of proposed changes affecting pool policies, fees, and services to ensure informed decision-making. Members expressed a desire for a complete package of proposed changes to be presented, detailing what members would gain or lose with the fee increase, particularly in light of potential service reductions.

The conversation also touched on staffing models, with suggestions to consider fewer employees compensated at higher wages to improve service quality while reducing costs. Liability issues concerning lifeguard staffing were noted as a critical factor in determining appropriate staffing levels. The council emphasized the importance of maintaining adequate staffing to ensure cleanliness and safety, addressing recurring issues such as facility cleanliness.

The council proposed establishing a timeline for addressing fee increases, with comprehensive answers to outstanding questions to be prepared for the next meeting. A target for the second reading of the new fees was set for mid-February, allowing official implementation by April 1.

In addition to pool-related discussions, the council addressed several other topics. The acquisition of two salt trucks was approved, with $200,000 appropriated for the purchase and $190,000 in bonds authorized to finance part of the cost. An ordinance concerning a franchise agreement with Comcast was tabled due to comments from the Board of Public Utilities that needed incorporation.

Public comments extended beyond the pool, with a property manager raising concerns about parking issues on Lincoln Street. The lack of parking lines and insufficient handicap spots were highlighted, affecting tenants of nearby buildings. Suggestions for a parking-by-permit-only system and outreach to local restaurant owners to advise patrons on alternative parking options were discussed.

Council members also considered an ordinance amending the township code regarding a business registration fee related to liability insurance. Concerns were expressed about the timing of discussing the fee, leading to a suggestion to table the conversation until a discussion could take place. The ordinance proposed a $15 fee for businesses operating within the township, with the aim of covering administrative costs associated with business registrations.