The meeting opened with a request from a contractor for a variance to install a generator at a residence, justified by the special needs of the family, which includes a sick member and a disabled son. The discussion delved into the technicalities of placement, noise control, and neighbor notification, with the board members conducting a site visit to better understand the situation. Despite a detailed examination, the public offered no comments, and the board ultimately granted approval for the generator installation.

Following the generator issue, the board shifted focus to a more contentious matter involving a request for variances to construct a deck. The applicant presented visual aids and explained that the proposed deck would exceed height restrictions and the allowable percentage of the dwelling’s footprint. During the discussion, board members voiced concerns about the potential exacerbation of flooding due to the impervious surface of the deck. The debate touched on aspects such as the professionalism of the deck drawings, input from the contractor, and the involvement of neighbors.

Amidst the discussion, there was confusion over the measurements of the rear yard setback, with conflicting figures presented by the board and the applicant. Some board members suggested that removing pavers from under the deck may alleviate water pooling concerns. The potential need for professional engineering review on complex applications like this was also brought up.

They balanced the specific needs of the applicants with the broader implications on the community, such as noise levels and stormwater management.