The committee’s discussion on ebikes took center stage due to rising public concerns over their speed and proper usage on trails and in parks. Jenna Smith, the Parks & Recreation Director, explained that the existing statutes were vague, prompting the need for a clear ordinance to differentiate between various types of ebikes and other motorized vehicles. The proposed ordinance aims to specify which classes of ebikes are permitted, with a focus on safety. Ebikes capable of reaching speeds between 30 to 52 miles per hour would be prohibited, while safer options like electric-assist bicycles that require pedaling would be allowed.

A discussion ensued about passenger regulations on ebikes, with Travis Bradley from the community development department clarifying that state statutes prohibit passengers on ebikes and motorized foot scooters. The conversation highlighted the need for helmet use for individuals under 18, aligning with safety measures adopted by neighboring areas. The committee acknowledged that while state law mandates a minimum age of 15 to operate an ebike, it does not require helmets for this age group. However, helmets would be required for those under 18 when using electric-assisted vehicles. The committee emphasized the importance of public education on these regulations, planning to use the city’s website and social media to inform the community about proper trail etiquette.

Further discussions revealed the complexities of integrating ebikes into existing infrastructure. The committee detailed the three classes of ebikes: Class one includes pedal-assist bikes without a throttle, Class two can be throttle-operated up to 20 miles per hour, and Class three bikes are pedal-assisted and can reach up to 28 miles per hour. Despite these classifications, the speed limit within parks and trails would remain at 15 miles per hour to ensure safety. The committee considered whether ebikes should be permitted in recreational areas like skate parks.

Amid the regulatory discussions, trail development projects were a significant topic. The committee reviewed ongoing projects aimed at addressing trail gaps and improving infrastructure. They noted major transportation projects like the Highway 5 improvements, which include pedestrian underpasses and trails, and the 82nd Street project, designed to enhance pedestrian and bicycle access. Maintenance efforts were also highlighted, including overlays to improve trail surfaces and the recent completion of a trail replacement due to tree root damage.

Communication with the public was emphasized. The committee recognized that many trail gaps present significant obstacles, such as the need for costly boardwalks, and urged transparency about the extensive requirements for these projects.

Concerns were raised about public perception regarding the progress of trail projects, with members acknowledging that ongoing communication is vital to clarify why certain projects may take precedence over others. The committee considered various communication strategies, including park signs to inform residents about known trail gaps and a potential quarterly update to enhance awareness of park developments.

The meeting also touched on the specific example of the Lake Bridge trail, where a roadblock sign had raised concerns about safety and accessibility. The discussion suggested using an online form to report issues related to parks and recreation.