The proposed R1A zoning is a response to previous denials of amendment requests to R1 standards, as directed by the city council. The new zoning would facilitate redevelopment efforts by adjusting minimum lot sizes from 12,000 square feet to 9,100 square feet and reducing front and rear setbacks. While side yard setbacks would remain unchanged, the proposal includes a maximum impervious cover of 35% and a building height limit of 35 feet. These adjustments aim to diversify housing options and encourage the construction of new homes or twin homes in place of older structures.

The commission’s dialogue highlighted the distinction between duplexes and twin homes, where duplexes are single structures housing two units, and twin homes are two separate single-family homes sharing a wall. This distinction is important for density calculations and ensuring fair and transparent zoning regulations. The discussion also touched on the challenges of balancing development needs with neighborhood character, emphasizing the importance of maintaining the community’s aesthetic appeal.

In addition to the R1A zoning, the commission delved into the broader zoning code review. The existing code, first established in 1998 and amended over time, has revealed over 500 items requiring attention. This extensive review process is expected to continue until at least fall 2026, focusing on updating outdated provisions and addressing illegal stipulations. The commission’s thorough approach involves categorizing districts, revising performance standards, and ensuring the code aligns with community needs.

Accessory structures were another focal point, with proposed regulations limiting their footprint to that of the principal residential structure, capped at 2,000 square feet. The intent is to prevent accessory buildings from overshadowing residential use. The commission debated the practicality of height restrictions on garages, proposing a maximum height of 10 feet to align with neighborhood norms. Further, accessory buildings would not be permitted as habitable spaces or for commercial purposes, maintaining a clear residential focus.

The meeting also covered proposed changes to off-street parking and driveway regulations. The commission emphasized the need for parking on approved surfaces like concrete or asphalt to maintain community aesthetics. Provisions were introduced to cap front yard impervious cover at 35%. The discussion acknowledged the complexities of modern vehicle sizes and the potential need to revisit parking space dimensions in future deliberations.

Outdoor storage, vehicle parking, and landscaping requirements were also scrutinized. The commission proposed screening requirements for stored vehicles, defined as those parked for over 48 hours, and clarified regulations on outdoor displays. The dialogue acknowledged the intersection of zoning regulations with municipal nuisance codes, particularly concerning solid fuel-fired heating devices and unauthorized structures on city outlots.