The public comment portion of the meeting saw a series of impassioned speeches from both local residents and community organizers, all voicing their apprehension regarding the AI data center’s potential environmental and safety risks. Kate Delaney, representing Food and Water Watch, highlighted the dangers associated with liquefied natural gas facilities included in the data center’s revised site plan. She emphasized the risk of explosions and the lack of transparency surrounding the project, urging the council to prioritize public safety. Heidi Yay from the Pinelands Alliance echoed these concerns, criticizing the council’s handling of the project and the need for more rigorous oversight of the developers.

Another resident, Bailey Wer, voiced his opposition, highlighting a petition with 6,600 signatures sent to Governor Mikey Cheryl calling for greater accountability and transparency. He criticized the council for proposing to limit public speaking time.

Concerns over reduced public speaking time resonated strongly throughout the meeting. Maryanne Lyelli and Nicole Alvarez, among others, argued against the proposed reduction, emphasizing the importance of allowing residents adequate time to articulate their views on issues. Alvarez stressed that the timing of the amendment raised questions about the council’s intent. Diane Gity shared a personal history with the council, expressing frustration over feeling unwelcome and unheard, particularly regarding the data center’s potential health impacts on her grandchildren with special needs.

The council maintained a structured environment during the meeting, with some members reminding attendees to adhere to decorum. However, tensions flared as discussions about the data center and public engagement policies continued. One council member, identified as Scott, defended the proposed speaking time reduction, citing previous experience on the school board. He emphasized the importance of public input for informed decision-making and committed to listening to constituents. Scott acknowledged the evolving nature of AI technologies and encouraged continued public dialogue.

In contrast, a resident identified as Larry questioned the transparency of council members, asking if any had stock in the data center’s minority owner, Northeast Precast. He expressed dissatisfaction with the lack of public involvement in the planning process, comparing it unfavorably to neighboring Bridgeton, where he perceived more transparency. Matt Williams also criticized the council’s transparency, questioning the legitimacy of the data center’s evolving site plans and expressing concern about noise pollution from its cooling system.

Public comments concluded with community member Jeff Lindseay suggesting the data center could invest in local youth initiatives, proposing that the community should have a financial stake in the project. This, he argued, might help address concerns about pollution, noise, and energy consumption.

Following the public comment session, the council moved forward with routine business, including the adoption of several ordinances related to the Vineland Municipal Electric Utility and other regulatory amendments. These ordinances were passed unanimously without public opposition. The meeting concluded with a motion to adjourn.