Volusia County Residents Demand Action on Flooding Amid Affordable Housing Debate

The recent Volusia County Council meeting was marked by discussions surrounding the significant flooding issues faced by residents in the Miller Lake area and the ongoing debate over the use of county-owned properties for affordable housing or recreational spaces. Community members expressed frustration over the county’s handling of flood management, while the council grappled with the competing needs for affordable housing and public parks.

18:42The meeting’s public participation segment was dominated by concerns from residents of the Miller Lake area, who are dealing with severe flooding problems. David Hill of Orange City voiced his dissatisfaction with the lack of communication and action from the county concerning Miller Lake’s water levels. He warned of the potential for flooding due to the lake’s water levels being higher than county drainage systems, a situation exacerbated by a 2017 agreement that allowed for commercial water runoff into the lake. Hill urged the council to revoke the permit responsible for the increased water inflow. Katherine Levenson brought visual evidence of the rising water levels, emphasizing the urgency for the council to act swiftly.

01:11:47The council’s response included a request for staff to provide a detailed report on the situation, signaling potential future actions.

39:47Affordable housing development was another focal point of the meeting. The council debated the allocation of 11 properties for affordable housing, previously identified through an RFP process. Concerns were raised about the suitability of these properties for housing due to flooding issues, with some council members advocating for the creation of pocket parks instead. The need for recreational spaces was highlighted, with discussions on converting wooded lots into parks and their associated costs.

Public comments contributed to the debate, with David Silcop of West Volusia Habitat for Humanity advocating for using the properties for housing, stressing the organization’s ability to transform these parcels into homes. Lori Gilli, CEO of Habitat for Humanity of Greater Volusia County, reinforced the importance of affordable housing, highlighting the financial benefits and community stabilization that such projects bring.

58:27The deliberations revealed a tension between the need for affordable housing and the desire for more recreational spaces. Some council members favored prioritizing housing to address pressing community needs, while others suggested a balanced approach considering both housing and parks.

01:34:54The discussion also touched on the broader fiscal challenges facing the county, with the council reviewing budgetary allocations and the financial implications of various projects. A notable discussion point was the sheriff’s budget, with concerns about reaching the statutory millage cap and the potential need for general fund support. EMS funding showed a positive outlook, with increased revenues allowing for reduced reliance on the general fund, thanks to surplus revenues from Medicare and Medicaid.

01:53:44The council also addressed the budgetary shortfall in beach access revenue, which fell short of initial estimates. This shortfall highlighted the need for adjustments in the general fund subsidy to maintain beach operations. The meeting included discussions on the need for increased lifeguard coverage in certain areas and the importance of the Ocean Center in hosting national events, amid concerns about future legislative funding.

03:03:04Public comments on the First Step Shelter highlighted its success in transitioning residents to permanent housing, with speakers urging continued support for the initiative. The shelter’s achievements include the recent housing of its 1,000th individual, underscoring its positive impact on the community.

01:23:15The council’s discussions concluded with various budgetary and ordinance matters, including the approval of a contract amendment for solid waste collection and a new ordinance regarding dangerous dogs, reflecting ongoing efforts to comply with state laws.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

is discussed during:
in these locations: