Robert Flity, a resident of Deltona, was a vocal proponent for the establishment of a citizen police review board in Volusia County. Flity argued that such a board would enhance oversight of law enforcement and promote transparency and accountability. He cited examples from other counties, such as Oakland, California, where the establishment of a review board reportedly led to a 24% reduction in payouts related to excessive force lawsuits. Flity emphasized that the proposal was fiscally responsible and in line with Florida’s home rule authority, which permits counties to create independent oversight bodies. He urged the council to place the amendment on the 2026 ballot, stating, “Let’s lead with accountability.”

In tandem with Flity’s proposal, Robert Sanchez from Edgewater expressed concerns about code enforcement practices, proposing an amendment that would require inspectors to obtain inspection warrants before entering private property. Sanchez pointed out that from 2014 to 2023, over 6,200 inspections were conducted without warrants, with only one warrant issued in 2023. He criticized the current system as potentially leading to government overreach and possible lawsuits against the county. “If you want to trespass on somebody’s property, you’re going to have to get an inspection warrant. No exceptions,” Sanchez asserted. He also raised concerns about alleged conflicts of interest involving code enforcement personnel and their family members, which he deemed problematic.

Katherine Pente from Daytona Beach presented a series of proposals aimed at enhancing environmental and fiscal responsibility within the county. She called for conservation efforts to be increased to 55% and suggested removing the council’s power over direct county expenditures, criticizing the perceived excessive spending as “dipping in the piggy bank.” Pente also advocated for code enforcement to utilize cameras and proposed banning fill and build practices, expressing concerns that raising land grades contributed to increased flooding.

The meeting also addressed procedural concerns in administrative hearings and communication outreach efforts. Sanchez criticized the handling of citizen complaints during administrative board hearings, emphasizing the need for due process and the board’s obligation to investigate reports of trespass or constitutional violations. He highlighted the financial barriers citizens face when appealing decisions, arguing for the continuation of cases if citizens cannot present their witnesses.

In another suggestion for charter amendments, Pente advocated for a constitutional amendment regarding the mill rate, proposing a provision to prevent it from being lowered indefinitely. She also insisted on council members reviewing all items presented before the Planning and Land Development Regulation Commission, arguing against the ability to “shirk that duty.”

The council also heard from Clayton Jackson, the county’s public information officer, who provided updates on outreach efforts related to the charter review commission. Enhancements to the commission’s website were highlighted, including a new button for public input and a direct link to the charter for review. Jackson emphasized efforts to disseminate information through social media and local press. A council member questioned the effectiveness of communication, particularly regarding print media, leading to a discussion about leveraging personal social media accounts for increased outreach.

As the meeting progressed, the council committed to reviewing all citizen feedback received online and ensuring it would be summarized and presented during the next meeting. The session, which lasted approximately 20 minutes, adjourned with a focus on facilitating citizen input and addressing procedural topics concerning community engagement with local governance.