The most notable discussion centered around a proposal for a 12×24 above-ground pool and an extended deck, which required multiple variances due to the lot’s undersized nature. The applicant sought to construct the deck 4.1 feet from the side property line, short of the required 10 feet. The council gave considerable attention to the safety and design of the deck, particularly concerning its proximity to the pool. The applicant explained that the design aimed to create a secure area for their four-year-old daughter, emphasizing the need for safety measures around the pool. To address concerns regarding impervious coverage, the applicant planned to replace part of the existing driveway with grass, thereby increasing open space. The proposal included fencing and self-closing gates to meet safety standards, although compliance with these requirements would be further addressed during the building permit phase.

Another noteworthy application involved a property on Evergreen Street, where an architect sought a variance for a front yard setback to accommodate an addition with a covered portico. The existing setback was 26.6 feet, while the zoning ordinance required 50 feet. The council determined that the proposed addition would not exacerbate the existing nonconformity, as it would match the current setback without reducing distance to the property line. The board approved the application, noting that similar modifications had been made in the neighborhood.

A separate application from Walt Jamros involved a detached garage on a corner lot at 54 McKay. The proposed garage would be located closer to the side street than typically allowed, reducing the setback from 17 to 10 feet. The council considered the unique layout of the lot and neighboring properties, ultimately supporting the variance due to its alignment with neighborhood aesthetics and the lack of impact on adjacent properties. The garage was designed to face McKay, maintaining the street’s character, and the application received unanimous approval.

The council also deliberated on a variance for an undersized lot on Highwood, where a covered porch was proposed to enhance street appeal. The property did not meet the required lot area or width, but the proposed porch was recognized as an improvement to the house’s aesthetic without compromising neighborhood character. The council approved the application, acknowledging the benefits of the updates.

Another application involved a second-story addition on a legally non-conforming corner lot on West Prospect Street. The applicant requested a front yard variance, citing the need for additional space due to a growing family. The council supported the application, recognizing that the addition would remain within the existing footprint and not alter current measurements.