Waldwick Planning Board Advances Fourth Round Housing Plan Amidst Fire Safety and Redevelopment Discussions

In a meeting, the Waldwick Planning Board advanced the fourth round housing elements and fair share plan to meet the borough’s affordable housing obligations by June 30 while addressing community concerns over fire safety and redevelopment projects. The board also approved a new restaurant plan and discussed fire safety measures to improve emergency access.

12:38The meeting’s primary focus was the review and public hearing on the borough’s draft of the fourth round housing elements and fair share plan. This draft, crucial for Waldwick to meet its affordable housing obligations, was introduced by the mayor. The planner, Paul Dragel, provided a detailed explanation of the historical context, referencing court cases from the 1970s and the establishment of the Fair Housing Act in the 1980s. He outlined that Waldwick’s plan, which previously created 81 credits for the third round, now aims to satisfy the fourth round requirements over a ten-year cycle. The plan breaks down obligations into a rehabilitation requirement of 19 units and a prospective fair share obligation of 164 affordable housing units, achieved through a compromise with the builders’ association.

Dragel discussed strategies such as vacant land deductions to manage these obligations and highlighted ongoing projects contributing to affordable housing credits, including a county United Way project and a group home. He emphasized the procedural importance of adopting the plan to protect the municipality from lawsuits related to inclusionary housing developments for a decade. A public hearing allowed residents to voice opinions about the draft, and board members were encouraged to ask questions before deciding to adopt the plan for further action by the mayor.

01:04:14In addition to housing plans, the board heard discussions on a proposed redevelopment project that sparked public interest and raised safety concerns. The project involves constructing a mixed-use building with commercial space on the first floor and 21 residential units above, fulfilling nine affordable housing credits due to its proximity to the rail station. The project includes installing a six-inch fire line and upgrading the sprinkler system to meet fire safety standards. The fire chief supported the proposal, confirming the adequacy of emergency access routes and the maneuverability of fire trucks.

01:11:51Grass pavers for emergency access at the north end of the site were also discussed, with the board contemplating whether to impose a variance. The zoning officer clarified that grass pavers had been treated as pervious in past projects, negating the need for a variance. The fire chief’s endorsement of the fire access provisions was critical for the board’s considerations.

01:02:29The meeting also addressed a site plan for a new restaurant, Gina Place, at the former Boston Market location on Wyoff Avenue. The applicant, George Chrysles, presented plans for a fast-casual Greek restaurant, emphasizing renovations and a simple menu. Concerns about parking were raised, with the applicant confirming 20 spaces behind the property and ongoing maintenance responsibilities. Despite this, the board expressed confidence that parking would not be an issue given the surrounding parking overlay. The board unanimously approved the application, noting a 45-day period during which the public could object to the approval.

01:31:53During public comments, the fire chief expressed satisfaction with the applicant’s efforts to address safety concerns, noting that previous issues were resolved. A property owner praised the redevelopment application, highlighting its aesthetic appeal and support from the council. The owner also shared past challenges with local projects and emphasized the importance of the development for the town’s infrastructure and tax revenue.

Concerns about the redevelopment project’s height and its impact on the community’s aesthetics were expressed by board members. Despite initial opposition, some members shifted their stance to support the project after observing the applicant’s collaboration with the fire department. Financial implications and procedural aspects were addressed, with a reminder of the board’s role in reviewing ordinances passed by the governing body.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

is discussed during:
in these locations: