Waldwick Planning Board Advances Key Boundary Adjustment Amid Heated Discussion

In a recent meeting of the Waldwick Planning Board, a contested boundary adjustment between two properties, marked by rigorous analysis and debate, became a focal point, reflecting the complexities of local urban planning.

The meeting, held this July, was presided over by the board with discussions centered around an application for a boundary adjustment between two properties on Frederick Street. The proposal has emerged as a controversial topic, inciting substantial debate over the nature and implications of such changes.

“We’re proposing a boundary adjustment between the two lots. There has been a boundary line agreement in place governing the area in question. So effectively, we’re memorializing the existing way that the properties have been used for years,” said a spokesperson for the application.

The issue at hand revolves around two existing lots that, due to an older boundary overlap agreement, have been used in a particular manner for years. The proposed change is a corrective measure, aiming to formalize the current use of the properties.

Despite the clear explanation, the proposal faced opposition and sparked controversy due to its requirement for a variance approval. A variance is an exception that allows a property to violate a zoning ordinance, and this proposal necessitates it due to the new lot sizes and building setbacks that would fall outside the current zoning laws.

The most contentious points of debate were the specifics regarding the setbacks, i.e., the minimum distance a structure can be located from a boundary line. The proposed plan includes several variances that deviate from the required setbacks, with minimum yard sizes and proximity of buildings to the boundary line presenting potential issues.

“Lot three has three variances that we’ve identified and reviewed,” stated the application representative, acknowledging the hurdles that this proposal would need to overcome. However, they argued that the existing conditions, including tree cover providing a natural buffer and plenty of separation between structures, should mitigate any perceived issues.

As for the proposed subdivision, the representative elaborated, “As per the deed, Lot 3 is 11,664 square feet, and the corrected proposed subdivision is 11,418 square feet. Lot 4 is 23,516 square feet, and the corrective subdivision has it at 22,667 square feet.”

Despite the perceived benefits, some board members raised concerns about the impact on the community’s character and zoning. Critics argued that such a move might set a precedent for future zoning exceptions, potentially leading to undesirable development patterns.

The spokesperson, however, countered these concerns, citing the public health and safety benefits and the rectification of the overlap as “furthering the purposes of the municipal law and land use law.” They also reassured the board that there would be “adequate lighting, air, and open space” due to no physical changes being made.

The board’s decision on this boundary adjustment signifies the complex balancing act required in local urban planning, between maintaining the community’s character and the needs of individual property owners. Despite opposition, it’s evident that the board acknowledges the need for flexibility and adaptation in their zoning laws to accommodate the unique scenarios that emerge in a dynamic community.

The meeting ended without a definitive resolution on the issue, signifying that the debate over boundary adjustments and variances in Waldwick is far from over. The board’s future actions on these matters will continue to shape the town’s physical and cultural landscape, underlining the importance of public participation in these local urban planning decisions.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.
Not avaliable:

Planning Board Officials:

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

Trending meetings
across the country:

Meeting Date
Filter by bodytypes
Agricultural Advisory Committee
Airport Advisory Board
Art and Culture Board
Beach Committee
Bike and Pedestrian Advisory Committee
Board of Elections
Board of Health
Borough Council
Building Committee
Cannabis Control Board
Cemetery Commission
Charter Revision Commission
Child and Family Services Board
City Council
City Identity Committee
Code Enforcement Board
College Board of Trustees
Community Appearance Board
Community Preservation Committee
Community Redevelopment Agency
County Council
Disability Advisory Committee
Economic Development Board
Elderly Affairs Board
Electric Advisory Board
Environmental Commission
Financial Oversight Board
Historic Preservation Commission
Housing Authority
Human Relations Committee
Human Resources Committee
Insurance Fund
Land Use Board
Library Board
Licensing Board
Mental Health Commission
Municipal Alliance
Open Space Commission
Oversight and Review Committee
Parking Authority
Parks and Gardens Commission
Parks Commission
Pension Board
Planning Board
Police Review Board
Property Assessment Board
Public Safety Committee
Recreation Commission
Redevelopment Agency
Rent Control Board
Rent Leveling Board
School Board
Sewerage Authority
Shade Tree Commission
Special Magistrate
Taxation & Revenue Advisory Committee
Tourism Board
Trails Committee
Transportation Board
Utility Board
Value Adjustment Board
Veterans Committee
Water Control Board
Women's Advisory Committee
Youth Advisory Committee
Zoning Board
Filter by County
FL
Bay County
Bradford County
Brevard County
Broward County
Clay County
Duval County
Escambia County
Gulf County
Hendry County
Highlands County
Hillsborough County
Indian River County
Lake County
Lee County
Leon County
Levy County
Liberty County
Manatee County
Marion County
Martin County
Miami-Dade County
Monroe County
Okaloosa County
Orange County
Osceola County
Palm Beach County
Pasco County
Pinellas County
Polk County
Putnam County
Santa Rosa County
Sarasota County
Seminole County
St. Johns County
Taylor County
Volusia County
Walton County
MA
Barnstable County
Berkshire County
Bristol County
Essex County
Franklin County
Hampden County
Hampshire County
Middlesex County
Norfolk County
Plymouth County
Suffolk County
Worcester County
NJ
Atlantic County
Bergen County
Burlington County
Camden County
Cape May County
Cumberland County
Essex County
Gloucester County
Hudson County
Hunterdon County
Mercer County
Middlesex County
Monmouth County
Morris County
Ocean County
Passaic County
Somerset County
Sussex County
Union County
Warren County
Filter by sourcetypes
Minutes
Recording