The most notable discussions revolved around the soil moving aspects of the synthetic turf field project. A substantial 5,100 cubic yards of topsoil are set to be removed to establish a proper base for the field, necessitating the importation of 5,200 cubic yards of stone in compliance with New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection regulations. The removal is primarily directed towards Woff Avenue, with a diminished amount potentially going to Traphagen School. Concerns were raised about tree removal, but it was confirmed that three trees would be taken down and replaced with 24 new plantings.

The conversation shifted to public participation, where a resident from Oak Place expressed frustration with project-related disruptions and a lack of notification. This issue underscored a gap in communication, with the board clarifying that notification responsibilities rested with the Board of Education. The resident detailed incidents of construction vehicles blocking access to their street and raised concerns about dust from the trucks. The board acknowledged the need to address operational disruptions but emphasized their limited authority in managing communication related to the broader project scope.

Traffic management and soil drainage were also scrutinized, particularly the use of Woff Avenue for transporting soil, as issues had arisen with trucks leaving the site via Oak Place. The drainage system directs water to a brook below the field’s elevation, intending to mitigate stormwater impacts. The board confirmed that any trees removed would be replaced with new evergreens along Oak Place, although concerns were voiced about the loss of deciduous trees that contribute to oxygen production.

Attention then turned to a proposed parking lot project at the high school, which prompted questions about stormwater management and soil movement. The plan involves significant soil cuts and backfill, necessitating the removal of 13 trees. Plans to replant nine trees were discussed, with the parking lot expansion aimed at adding 76 new spaces through reconfiguration. Board members voiced frustration over projects starting without proper permits, highlighting a pattern of retroactive approvals.

Discussions over a proposed development on Harrison Avenue centered around traffic and emergency access. Concerns about parking constraints due to the loss of spaces for new driveways were addressed, noting that patrons would need to find alternative parking. Questions arose about emergency vehicle access, with the traffic engineer confirming that vehicles could navigate the driveway if no cars were parked on the street. This sparked debates about potential no-parking zones to ensure safety.

The meeting addressed additional public concerns, including the adequacy of parking for a proposed apartment complex with 1.5 spaces per unit. It was noted that proximity to the train station might reduce reliance on car ownership. Residents also voiced doubts about the area’s rail usage and its impact on parking. The board emphasized adherence to established ordinances.