The redevelopment of Block 107, specifically lots 9 through 17, was a primary focus, with debates over the prioritization of development areas. Concerns were raised about focusing on less visible back lots rather than the prominent intersection of Franklin Turnpike and Prospect Street. One member argued for addressing lots 9, 10, 11, 13, and 17 first, emphasizing their potential to enhance the town’s visual appeal and accessibility. However, it was clarified that the decision to focus on specific sections was made by the mayor and council, with the planner explaining that the current approach was tactical. Questions about the development’s density were addressed, noting the proposal of 42 units, which included both apartments and townhouse-style units.

Affordable housing legislation was another significant topic, with recent requirements creating a complex planning landscape. The Department of Community Affairs set a January 31 deadline for municipalities to propose alternatives to their affordable housing numbers. Discussion highlighted the lack of legislative requirements for green space preservation, despite current zoning allowing up to 80% lot coverage. Concerns over potential displacement of renters in redevelopment areas were noted, especially as negotiations with property owners were underway.

The proposed building on North also sparked heated discussion about its size and design. Some attendees criticized its scale, comparing its appearance unfavorably to other residential structures. The bottom floor, designed as a parking garage with a high ceiling, received particular scrutiny. Economic implications were considered, with high rental prices in nearby areas cited as a concern for attracting residents from outside Waldwick. The board discussed the requirement for affordable housing units within the development, reflecting state mandates.

The mixed-use development proposal, featuring 42 residential units and retail spaces, faced challenges due to zoning regulation discrepancies, particularly regarding parking. The project proposed 81 parking spots, below the required 120, relying on reductions permitted by redevelopment plans. Economic viability was a concern, with high rents necessary to support construction costs for storefronts and parking. The board explored potential solutions, such as shared parking arrangements.

The board’s deliberations also touched on the broader implications of redevelopment, including potential tax benefits and the need for timely project completion. Concerns about the power dynamics between the town and developers were raised, emphasizing the importance of adherence to agreed standards. Members expressed frustration over limited public engagement, recognizing fluctuations in attendance based on financial implications and tax impacts.