Washington School Board Faces Controversy Over Health Benefits Transition and Athletic Event Fees

The Washington (Gloucester County) School Board meeting addressed issues, including complications with the transition to a new health benefits platform and ongoing debates about charging fees for athletic events. Discussions also touched on honoring a long-time coach, filling a vacant board seat, and addressing allegations of conflicts of interest in the insurance bidding process.

0:00One part of the meeting revolved around the transition of health benefits from a fully insured product to a self-insured platform known as the School Health Insurance Fund (SHIP). Representatives from the insurance broker, BR Brown, provided an overview of the transition, highlighting complications that arose, particularly with vision benefits. Jack McDermit, a senior vice president at BR Brown, acknowledged significant inconveniences caused by the transition, especially regarding the reimbursement or point-of-sale scheduling for vision benefits.

A board member raised concerns about the reimbursement process, emphasizing that not all employees could afford to pay out-of-pocket for services upfront. This was particularly problematic during the summer months when many teaching staff schedule their appointments. Mike Mo, the president of the insurance provider, apologized for the rough transition and committed to resolving the outstanding issues, also offering gift cards to all employees to ameliorate the situation.

Another major topic was the potential implementation of fees for attendance at various athletic events. The debate centered on the financial benefits versus the impact on community spirit and student participation. The athletic director noted that since the decision to stop charging for games, attendance had increased by about 20%, equating to roughly 400 more attendees at events. Concerns were raised about the logistics of handling cash transactions and the impact on less affluent students who might be unable to afford the fees. The idea of an enterprise account was suggested to earmark the generated funds specifically for athletic programs, such as providing championship jackets for winning teams.

16:52A concern highlighted was the disparity in funding for non-athletic events, such as performing arts, where students were typically charged a fee for entry. The board discussed the need for equity across student activities, considering the financial constraints faced by the district. Some members emphasized the importance of maintaining school spirit and community engagement.

46:13The board decided to forgo implementing charges for the current year, with plans to revisit the topic in November for a more discussion.

Another agenda item was the proposal to name the back turf field in honor of Coach Tony Duca, a long-standing teacher and coach in the district. A board member detailed Coach Duca’s contributions over his 30-plus years in the district, including his role as head football coach during the team’s undefeated season in 1970. A motion to officially name the back turf field after Coach Duca was made, with plans for a small ceremony to announce the naming set for a Saturday in late October.

The meeting also addressed the vacant board seat following a resignation. Nominations were opened, and two candidates were put forward: Linda Hartong and Jim Arpino. However, neither candidate achieved the required majority during the roll call votes. It was noted that if no appointment occurred within the stipulated timeframe, the county superintendent would be responsible for selecting a candidate from the list of nominees.

2:19:39Community concerns regarding potential conflicts of interest and the insurance bidding process were also raised. A speaker questioned the extended timeline for the health benefits RFP process from 2021 and suggested potential bid rigging. The speaker requested transparency regarding the evaluation ranking of the bidders and whether the board sought legal guidance on the process. A board member acknowledged the concerns.

2:36:49The meeting concluded with a discussion about the school rankings within Gloucester County and the impact of socioeconomic factors on educational outcomes. The board also discussed the need for improved communication and engagement within the community, emphasizing the importance of supporting teachers, administration, and staff to enhance academic standings.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

is discussed during:
in these locations: