One resident, Paul Tractenberg, raised the connection between the proposed amendment and the potential for extensive tree removal at the West Essex Highlands development site, expressing concern about the broader environmental and public safety implications. Susan Goldstein, another resident, emotionally opposed the amendment, stressing the vital role trees play in the ecosystem and the negative consequences that could arise from the development on the local environment and flooding patterns.

The urgency to implement the revised tree ordinance was a recurring theme during the council meeting, as individuals argued for the immediate enactment of the ordinance to protect the community and the environment. The speakers’ collective message to the council was to uphold the existing tree ordinance and not to delay its implementation. Skepticism was aired regarding the reasons for the proposed delay, with the community members requesting transparency and questioning the justifications presented.

In addition to the tree ordinance, the council meeting tackled the topic of pedestrian and traffic safety. The council discussed various intersection improvements designed to enhance pedestrian safety and the efficiency of traffic signal operations. Residents raised issues about traffic speed, patterns of accidents, and the need for traffic calming measures, while others called for an inclusive approach that considers the mobility of all road users, including cyclists. The council addressed these concerns by discussing the potential addition of pedestrian countdown timers, exclusive pedestrian phases, and curb bump outs at specific intersections.

During public comments, a community member from Montclair emphasized the importance of comprehensive traffic safety strategies and the application of Vision Zero principles, which aim to eliminate all traffic fatalities and severe injuries. Concerns about nighttime lighting and its impact on visibility were also addressed, with the council mentioning the implementation of high visibility crosswalks and reflectorized back plates to improve safety.

The council’s discussion extended to the handling of public input and the importance of transparency in decision-making. One council member highlighted the necessity of public engagement, particularly from younger residents, and acknowledged the efforts of individuals advocating for issues. The topic of public meetings and the ability to accommodate public input, especially in the context of the ongoing pandemic, was raised, with the council expressing a commitment to ensuring residents’ voices are heard.

The meeting also touched upon the upcoming township events and updates, including a travel alert, bear sightings, and the anticipated public hearing for garbage and the township council budget workshop. The Downtown Alliance’s executive director took the opportunity to thank volunteers for a recent street fair and to highlight new businesses and upcoming downtown events.

In the realm of resolutions, the council addressed concerns related to the disposal of shelving and the award of a Professional Services agreement for cancer screening for the West Orange Fire Department. Discussions arose over the cost implications of disposing of the shelving and the necessity of having two service providers for cancer screenings. Questions regarding the involvement of the mayor in the agreement were also brought forth, leading to a wider dialogue about the evaluation of service providers and the state reimbursement for the screening services.

Finally, the introduction and final reading of several ordinances took place, with the council approving measures related to bus stops at Roosevelt Middle School and restricted parking zones at specific addresses. The issue of public notification about the newly passed tree ordinance was a point of debate, with suggestions to improve communication to residents through the township’s website and other avenues.