The meeting also saw discussions on the appointment of an economic development consultant, with Resolution 10424 approving an agreement with Mishen Group LLC. While some council members expressed reservations about the timing and spending implications, the resolution was ultimately approved, emphasizing the expertise and potential value the firm could bring to West Orange’s economic initiatives.

Public comments formed a substantial part of the meeting’s discourse, with residents addressing a range of topics from tree ordinance changes, recycling center management, and the economic consultant RFP to concerns over legal representation and pending litigation. Speakers raised issues about a potential lawsuit and the legality of the township attorney’s actions, resulting in a failed motion due to lack of a second.

The council engaged in a lengthy debate over an ordinance related to tree removal regulations, which was characterized by confusion and frustration. Members expressed differing opinions on the appropriate tree diameter for removal and the enforceability of the regulations. The ordinance aims to balance environmental protection with resident property rights, but with no consensus reached, further discussion and a workshop were suggested.

In the realm of planning and development, the council members deliberated on whether to hire a full-time planner or engage a consulting firm. The flexibility and expertise offered by a consultancy were contrasted against the benefits of a dedicated full-time planner.

Another topic was the introduction and approval on first reading of an ordinance related to lead-based paint Hazard inspection requirements for rental dwellings. The potential financial impact on property owners and the importance of educating homeowners about new state requirements were key points of discussion.

The council also tackled the parking requirements for cannabis businesses. The need to adjust the parking spaces for micro-cultivators, who generally have a smaller workforce, led to the decision to amend the parking requirement to 600 for cannabis manufacturers and cultivators, with the amendment to be introduced in the next meeting.

Additional agenda items included a debate on fees for dog park passes and the authorization of a contract for cleaning and restoration services. The council addressed a resolution directing the termination of pending litigation, with differing views on the need for council resolution versus mayoral withdrawal of the lawsuit.

Moreover, the council discussed ordinances on traffic regulations, parking regulations on certain streets, and significant deterioration of the township’s tree canopy.