02:00The meeting opened with a detailed presentation on the town’s parking issues. John McCormack from Dynamics Traffic and Jerry Giosa from Level G Associates delivered findings from a nine-month study, which underscored significant challenges in residential and business district parking. McCormack highlighted the problem of fully occupied streets without sufficient driveways, complicating emergency vehicle access. The report called for converting certain two-way streets to one-way, which could potentially create an additional 450 parking spaces. It also recommended shifting from alternate side parking to street sweeping regulations, thereby improving parking availability.

12:59Inconsistencies in parking meter functionality and enforcement in business districts were noted, contributing to revenue losses estimated between $60,000 and $70,000 annually. The proposal included implementing a hybrid meter system utilizing kiosks and mobile apps for payment, rather than traditional meters. A structured parking department was proposed, with projected costs of $610,000 initially and $25,000 annually for operations. Expected revenues from enhanced enforcement and new meters were predicted to reach $1.3 million within five years.

05:45The discussion revealed concerns about potential resistance from residents regarding street conversions, necessitating community outreach and engagement. Questions also arose about the creation of bureaucratic positions within the new department. The council considered these changes essential for improving traffic flow and enhancing the business environment in West Orange, acknowledging that parking enforcement and infrastructure need modernization to meet contemporary challenges.

54:28The council also turned its attention to the Immigrant Trust Act, a proposed resolution aimed at ensuring local law enforcement does not collaborate with federal immigration authorities. Multiple residents supported the act, emphasizing its importance in safeguarding immigrant families from deportation and ensuring their access to essential services. Proponents argued that codifying existing directives into law would provide clearer protections and separate local policing from federal immigration enforcement.

Opponents suggested the resolution might be symbolic and potentially distract from more issues, yet it was noted that numerous towns across New Jersey have backed the act. The council recognized the emotional weight of the issue for many residents, with some immigrants expressing fear of deportation amid increased federal activities. The resolution’s outcome remained undecided, reflecting broader debates on immigration policy and community safety.

03:17:50Financial concerns were also a focal point, with discussions about the township’s corrective action plan revealing significant discrepancies in past audits, including unapplied grants totaling $596,000. The council emphasized the need for improved financial oversight and accountability, noting that unresolved checks and outdated accounting practices necessitate systemic changes. The corrective action plan aimed to address these issues, though concerns about the effectiveness of current accounting procedures persisted.

51:21Noise disturbances and the need for a revised ordinance were highlighted, as residents continued to report issues with noise from local businesses. The council debated whether to pursue a state model ordinance or implement simpler revisions. The discourse underscored the necessity of balancing business operations with residential quality of life.

The meeting concluded with the introduction of a resolution supporting the Immigrant Trust Act, though it faced contention. The council also discussed scheduling budget workshops to address fiscal challenges and community needs, emphasizing the importance of timely budget approval to avoid complications with tax billing.