The meeting’s most discussion centered on a presentation by Dave Novak from Burgess Associates, which highlighted mismatches between the existing zoning regulations and the development patterns within Baran City. The presentation revealed that while the majority of the area was zoned R1A, with a residential character, 100% of the lots did not meet the minimum size requirement. This discrepancy has implications for the application of zoning regulations such as yard requirements and building envelopes.

The board debated the challenges arising from non-conforming conditions in the R1A district. Questions arose regarding the accuracy of the data used in the zoning study, as it was based on estimates and mapping programs that may not be survey accurate. The chair of the Zoning Board of Adjustment clarified that variances would be necessary only for planned renovations and that the study aimed to make this process less complicated for property owners. The consensus was that the study should bring properties closer to compliance or at least reduce the need for variances.

Public comments at the meeting were vocal about the character and scale of new construction in Baran City. Concerns about houses being “totally out of scale and out of character” with the neighborhood were mentioned. The need to “retain the character of the neighborhood” amid renovations and new construction was a recurring theme. This sparked discussions on maintaining the area’s character while allowing for property upgrades, with a focus on specific design standards, house sizes, and zoning regulations. Notably, the lack of design standards for single-family homes in the township was identified as an issue, prompting suggestions for the implementation of such standards to preserve the neighborhood’s aesthetic.

The topic of ADUs also garnered attention, with proposed legislation to permit ADUs on certain lots, subject to conditions like having a full kitchen and a full bathroom. While this raised concerns about the strain on the sewer and water systems, it also highlighted the need for flexibility in zoning to accommodate multigenerational families. The historical character of the neighborhood was a central consideration, with suggestions to create a booklet outlining house styles and to establish architectural guidelines to preserve the historical character of the area.

Several residents took the opportunity to express their views on the neighborhood’s development. The importance of promoting the historic identity of Baran City and preserving its unique character was emphasized. Concerns were also raised about the potential impact of large houses on sunlight and the neighborhood’s character. The board acknowledged these concerns and expressed willingness to consider feedback and work towards addressing the issues raised.

The new tree ordinance was another significant item on the board’s agenda. The ordinance mandates property owners to replace any healthy trees that are cut down and allows for payments to the town for planting trees elsewhere if on-site replacement is not feasible. The ordinance sparked discussion on the impact of development on the neighborhood’s character and the preservation of green spaces.