The board’s discussion on the pet daycare ordinance, tied to a settlement agreement, was marked by concerns over the lack of outdoor space for pets. The ordinance permits indoor-only operations, with soundproofing and specific construction requirements for animal safety, while outdoor facilities are restricted due to the site’s proximity to residential areas and a swimming pool. This decision was based on concerns expressed by the health officer regarding potential waste management issues. A board member voiced skepticism by stating, “I wouldn’t be dropping my pet there in a hurry,” reflecting broader concerns about how such a facility could function without outdoor accommodations. The ordinance was ultimately approved as the board confirmed its consistency with the master plan, which supports the creation of a mixed-use, walkable neighborhood.

Attention then shifted to the Bear Creek senior living facility project, which sought amendments to its final site plan. The project, with documentation dating back to 1996, proposed several changes to remain competitive in the current market. These changes included adding underground parking and reconfiguring existing parking lots. Importantly, the building’s height will be raised slightly to accommodate below-grade parking, yet still comply with local height restrictions.

The revised site plan also details the addition of freestanding garages, intended to provide secure parking for unique vehicles like motorcycles. The project’s representative emphasized that these changes would not increase the number of marketable units or expand the building’s footprint. There are still 51 affordable and 69 market-rate units, maintaining the previous unit count. The introduction of underground parking sparked discussions about potential parking fees, especially for affordable housing residents. While underground spaces will be available for rent, surface parking remains free, addressing concerns over equitable access to parking facilities.

Concerns were also raised about whether the underground parking would include electric vehicle charging facilities. The fire chief was involved in discussions about the safety of these stations, with provisions made for future installations. The project’s architect and traffic consultant provided testimonies on the proposed changes.

The board considered the implications of parking logistics, especially the absence of assigned parking spaces in the underground garage. A participant noted the potential for traffic congestion without designated spaces, leading to suggestions for assigning parking spaces to improve circulation. Additionally, the courtyard between the building’s wings will feature a pavilion alongside a retained pool, and the reconfigured tennis and pickleball courts will accommodate the parking alterations.

The project met all relevant bulk standards under the PRC C Zone, with a minor reduction in impervious coverage compared to a previous approval. The board also considered the discharge of pool water, which must comply with health regulations, and the inclusion of electric vehicle charging stations in line with previous applications.

Finally, the board discussed the building’s design and specifications, particularly focusing on the roof and garage features. Concerns about snow accumulation on the flat roof were addressed with assurances of adequate drainage through a slight slope. The building’s design includes roof-mounted equipment centrally located and concealed to maintain aesthetic consistency. The garage, mechanically ventilated due to insufficient natural ventilation, will feature motion sensor-activated lighting to ensure safety.