0:20Discussions on the checklist updates revealed a multi-faceted approach aimed at refining the application process. A representative from Burgess Associates explained that outdated requirements, such as consulting the Department of Agriculture for soil-related issues, no longer apply. The board also considered creating tailored checklists for various application types rather than zoning districts. This uniform approach would accommodate overlaps in information required for different applications, balancing specificity with practicality.

The waiver process for checklist items emerged as a significant topic. It was clarified that applicants could request waivers for items deemed unnecessary, although the Technical Review Committee (TRC) plays a role in evaluating these requests. An example cited involved traffic studies, typically required when an application generates over 100 trips. If staff disagrees with a waiver, applicants must submit the requisite information.

Concerns about missing items on extensive checklists prompted the development of user-friendly forms to enhance clarity. These forms allow applicants and township staff to mark and acknowledge each item, minimizing oversight. This updated process aims to streamline the review and ensure all necessary information is accounted for, reducing the potential for litigation if applications are denied due to missing information not explicitly required by the checklist.

35:43Street naming policies also garnered attention, with discussions about naming streets “Novak Boulevard” and the township’s policy against using individual names. This policy aims to prevent controversies linked to honoring individuals, especially municipal employees, in street naming. The board recognized the value of maintaining a consistent theme for street names, favoring options like flowers or trees over personal honors, while still considering historically significant names.

54:42A recurring theme was the implications of housing developments on school populations. Concerns were raised about the reliability of estimates for school children generated by new developments. One council member argued that these estimates, often generalized and not specific to West Windsor, could be contested in court if relied upon without a solid basis. The school district’s own research, based on historical data, was deemed more reliable for anticipating the impact of new housing on school populations.

35:43The board also addressed the environmental impact statement requirements and the green development practices checklist. Acknowledging that oversight led to the deletion of certain requirements, the board agreed to reinstate them. The conversation touched on soil conservation practices, with the Mercer County Soil Conservation District handling related issues, making local ordinance updates unnecessary at this time.

Traffic engineering was another focal point, with particular concern over truck traffic’s impact on residential areas. The board discussed requiring applicants to submit data on truck traffic volumes and circulation plans, particularly for developments. The TRC process plays a role in determining the necessity of traffic impact studies.

1:31:42As the meeting concluded, there was a call for comprehensive documentation of ordinance changes, with a request to see the entire ordinance rather than just amended portions. This push for clarity aimed to provide a better context for understanding proposed changes, emphasizing the need for transparency in the planning process.