A significant portion of the meeting was dominated by public comments addressing financial matters, notably the compensation for township positions. Concerns were raised about the cost-effectiveness of hiring a Public Information Officer (PIO) at $74 an hour, with residents questioning whether this role was necessary, given the current communication strategies. The council defended the hire, explaining that the PIO would only work five hours a month, costing approximately $5,000 annually. The council emphasized the importance of accurate information dissemination and cited the PIO’s successful track record in a similar role elsewhere.

Further financial scrutiny emerged over the township’s decision to engage a company to assist with financial operations rather than appointing a full-time Chief Financial Officer (CFO). The council explained this was a temporary measure to transition from paper systems to a more efficient cloud-based infrastructure. This move was intended to lay the groundwork for a future CFO hire. The council assured residents that these changes were necessary to enhance operational efficiency and were based on recommendations from experienced professionals.

Public concern also centered on the township’s social media presence and communication methods. Residents pointed out a lack of engagement on platforms widely used by younger demographics, suggesting that the township’s reliance on traditional media, such as the Burlington County Times, was inadequate. Calls were made for the township to increase its social media activity to better connect with all residents.

Another resident highlighted issues with the township’s vehicle inventory, questioning the necessity of maintaining a fleet when only a fraction of the vehicles were operational. The council addressed the discrepancies, explaining the various functions of the trucks and assuring residents of ongoing efforts to manage resources responsibly.

Public comments also touched upon the ordinance discussions, particularly the creation of Chapter 19 in the Township Code to define the clerk’s duties. Residents expressed confusion over the lack of codification in the township’s code book, which the council acknowledged, pledging to enhance transparency and accessibility of information. The first reading of the ordinance received unanimous approval after it was explained to align with state code.

The meeting also provided updates on community initiatives, such as the recreation committee’s activities, including indoor soccer and basketball programs involving hundreds of children. Plans for an Easter egg hunt were also mentioned, highlighting the township’s efforts to engage with families and foster community spirit.

As discussions continued, the council addressed the issue of security funding for a county shelter, reassuring residents that they would not bear the financial burden for its operation. The council confirmed the shelter’s groundbreaking and outlined a timeline for completion, emphasizing the need for 24/7 security.

Members expressed gratitude for community involvement, noting the value of diverse perspectives in shaping township policies. The council reiterated its dedication to improving communication channels and ensuring residents remain informed about township activities.