Councilor Harris initiated the meeting’s core discussion by proposing a tax rate of 1.75. He emphasized the financial challenges facing residents due to increased costs for essential services such as waste management, sewer, and water. Harris explained that the proposed rate would increase costs for residents by $22 per month and businesses by $115, asserting that the disparity was fair given that businesses could offset expenses through tax deductions not available to residents. This proposal was not about creating division but rather achieving fairness under current circumstances.

An important aspect of the meeting was the contention surrounding the use of free cash. Councilor Sullivan read a letter from the Mayor, who opposed using free cash to alleviate tax rates, arguing that such considerations should occur during the budgeting process. Sullivan, supporting the business community, argued that a tax shift favoring businesses could benefit residents by attracting more commercial activities to Westfield. He cited a proposal from the Chamber of Commerce for a 1.61 tax rate, stressing its potential for economic growth.

Councilor Figgy then proposed an amendment for a 1.65 tax rate, which he felt was a responsible compromise given the uncertain availability of free cash. Figgy highlighted that the budget was crafted without knowing if free cash would be available.

The debate extended to concerns about the lack of leadership in business development. A council member criticized the absence of a development director. Another member echoed this sentiment, expressing frustration over the stagnation in new business growth, which they linked to the lack of a proactive growth strategy.

As the council navigated various proposals, a motion for a 1.74 tax rate was narrowly defeated, with four votes in favor and seven against. Similarly, a proposal for a 1.65 rate failed, receiving five votes in favor and six against, as did a 1.61 rate, which was unanimously rejected. The council eventually coalesced around a 1.68 rate.

The meeting also touched on the residential factor, with unanimous agreement among present members. Additionally, in response to public concern over rising fees, Councilor Matthews-Kane informed attendees of various abatement programs available to assist residents.