Westfield Planning Board Approves Kennel Permit and Tackles Zoning Changes

In a recent meeting, the Westfield Planning Board approved a special permit for a residential kennel and delved into amendments to the zoning ordinance regarding accessory dwelling units (ADUs), reflecting ongoing adjustments to state regulations and community concerns.

2:02The board’s approval of a residential kennel permit for Linda Degan on SA Road was a focal point of the meeting. The discussion clarified that the permit would not increase the number of animals on the property beyond nine adult dogs. Steven Kuzak, representing Degan, emphasized her longstanding reputation as a responsible breeder and confirmed that the dogs are housed primarily within the home, with an outdoor fenced pen for safety. The board addressed neighborhood concerns expressed by Richard and Marsha, who opposed the potential for business activities in the area, wanting to preserve neighborhood character. The permit’s conditions, including a non-transferable clause and a provision for property inspection, were unanimously approved, with the board emphasizing adherence to these stipulations to avoid permit revocation.

20:29In addition to the kennel permit, the board’s attention was drawn to two petitions aiming to amend the zoning ordinance related to accessory dwelling units. These discussions were informed by recent updates to state regulations, which introduced changes like excluding garage space from the ADU’s gross floor area calculations and allowing special permits for ADUs in aquifer zones. The board grappled with the implications of these changes, particularly how they might impact the development of ADUs in different zoning districts. There was a consensus on requiring site plan approval for detached ADUs to maintain the character of single-family districts, although some members noted inconsistencies with single-family dwellings not needing such approvals.

A particular concern was the amendment’s impact on the residential character of specific areas like Court Street, highlighted by Councilor Bridget Matthews Kane. She cautioned that removing single-family residential permissions could prevent properties converted from businesses back to residences from reverting, potentially skewing the balance between residential and commercial uses.

39:31Further complicating the zoning discussions was the redefinition of what constitutes a single-family dwelling. The state now allows for mixed-use buildings to qualify, raising questions about the categorization of properties with both residential and business elements. This change prompted a broader conversation about the flexibility of properties transitioning between residential and commercial uses without triggering a change of use classification.

20:29The board’s deliberations also touched on setback requirements, with state regulations now permitting ADUs to have setbacks akin to accessory structures, providing greater flexibility for property owners. The nuanced discussions highlighted the need for clear and enforceable regulations, especially in light of evolving state laws.

39:31To cap off the meeting, the board addressed ongoing community issues, such as unregistered vehicles on Madeas Way. Despite a cease-and-desist letter, compliance was still a concern. The board expressed confidence in the building department’s ability to enforce community standards, emphasizing the importance of maintaining regulations.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

Trending meetings
across the country: