The primary focus of the meeting was the application by Anato Oduk, seeking a special permit to divide a lot into two single-family dwelling lots by reducing the frontage and side setbacks. Oduk presented two development options: constructing two single-family homes if the permit was approved, or building a duplex if denied. The decision hinged on approval from the Department of Public Works regarding water and sewer availability, which Oduk confirmed had been resolved.

Oduk argued that the reduced setbacks were justified by the lot’s square footage meeting minimum requirements. However, board members expressed skepticism, with one stating, “this land doesn’t support two houses this size.” A key point of contention was the proposed reduction of the side setback from 15 feet to 10 feet, which the board found unnecessary and potentially detrimental to the neighborhood’s character.

The discussion included a review of draft conditions for the permit, emphasizing substantial conformance with the submitted plans and a requirement for connection to city sanitary sewer infrastructure. Ultimately, the board decided against the setback reduction, citing potential negative impacts on the surrounding area. The permit failed to garner the necessary supermajority for approval.

In addition to the special permit deliberations, the board addressed a proposed zoning amendment to allow professional and personal services in the industrial district. The proposal, still in its early stages, aims to reintroduce uses akin to those previously permitted in business B zones, which have been restricted for about 15 years. The board considered the potential benefits of expanding business opportunities in industrial areas but also expressed concerns about the practicality and impact on industrial character.

One member questioned the fit of small service-oriented businesses in industrial zones, fearing the creation of strip malls and detraction from the area’s industrial essence. Another member noted that much of the industrial land is constrained or unsuitable for development.

Despite these reservations, there was some support for exploring the inclusion of certain businesses through a special permit process. However, the board sought more clarity on the proposal’s intentions and potential implications before making formal recommendations.