One focus of the meeting was the cost-benefit analysis related to the future of the town’s existing structures, particularly the current high school and town hall. The committee examined the financial implications of both maintaining and renovating these buildings versus constructing new facilities. A recurring theme throughout the meeting was the financial burden of doing nothing, with estimates for maintaining existing buildings potentially leading to costly consequences. For instance, the cost of demolishing the current school building, if left unattended, could reach $3 million.

The members debated the merits of various options, such as developing a community campus that integrates town resources and potentially generates revenue through added facilities and services. However, they recognized the challenge of accurately forecasting costs and resources for these facilities. The adaptive reuse option was noted for its long-term financial commitment, with projected costs of $81 million over 30 years. The committee also considered the implications of selling municipal properties, which could result in the loss of valuable community spaces like playing fields.

The town hall’s structural and code compliance issues were another significant topic of discussion. Members examined the necessity of bringing the town hall up to current standards, especially if any additions are made. The absence of a sprinkler system and the required upgrades for earthquake standards, fire protection, and ADA accessibility were highlighted as concerns. The committee recognized the importance of understanding what renovations could be accomplished without incurring additional upgrade costs and suggested including clear details in the final report to the select board.

Discussions about the former high school building revealed its current role in the community. There was a proposal to maintain the gymnasium while considering the demolition of other sections of the building to create a new community center. The plan aimed to address space needs for various groups, including the Council on Aging, while maintaining some classroom facilities. The committee emphasized the importance of communicating the building’s active role in the community to dispel misconceptions about its utility.

The committee also recognized the need for a comprehensive public engagement strategy. A proposal was made to hold an interactive public meeting, allowing residents to engage with tangible materials such as maps and design layouts. This approach was intended to foster a collaborative atmosphere and gather community input on preferences. The committee was aware of the potential for overwhelming turnout and discussed methods to manage the meeting dynamics effectively.

There was a consensus on the importance of presenting a single option at the public meeting to avoid confusion and ensure a focused discussion. The preferred option would be introduced with comprehensive information, including potential debt exclusions and their impact on taxpayers. The committee acknowledged the necessity of being well-prepared, with a united front on the chosen option to facilitate informed decision-making at the special town meeting.

Plans were set for the next committee meeting on July 8th, where further discussions would take place regarding the upcoming public meeting and strategies to engage effectively with the community. The committee also tentatively scheduled the public meeting for August 6th, allowing adequate time for preparation and outreach. The goal was to ensure a productive meeting that balances the presentation of information with opportunities for public interaction, emphasizing a collaborative environment in decision-making processes.