A major topic of discussion was the effort to connect more residents to the newly extended water mains. The committee highlighted that while 166 potential customers had access to the system, only 39 had connected, despite 51 initially taking advantage of free hookup offers. The committee expressed dissatisfaction with this outcome, particularly as the town is currently wasting water to maintain quality in the pipelines. A fee of $30 per quarter will soon be imposed on those who have not connected, as outlined in the original agreement. The committee recognized the challenge posed by the existence of functioning wells, which many residents prefer to use, citing cost and the perceived lack of necessity to switch to the municipal supply. The committee considered conducting a survey to better understand community reservations about the water system.

The committee also discussed a new agreement with Fall River, which aims to settle disputed balances and establish a new, lower rate for water. The agreement has been sent to legal counsel for review and awaits Fall River’s countersignature. This agreement is expected to provide financial relief and support efforts to encourage more connections, as a larger customer base would contribute to reduced costs.

A key component of the meeting was the discussion of various funding sources, including a $5 million earmark from Senator Keating for sewer phases and an $8 million grant from Mass DOT. These funds are intended to support the extension of water and sewer lines, particularly along Route 6. However, confusion arose over the total available funding, with differing opinions on the amounts and sources. The committee emphasized the need to distinguish between earmarks and grants, especially as the state’s budget continues to evolve.

Procurement processes were identified as a potential cause of delays. The committee discussed the necessity of a qualification-based selection (QBS) process for hiring engineering firms, which would prioritize specific evaluation criteria over low bids. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is expected to confirm whether this process will be required, potentially adding 8 to 12 weeks to project timelines. This delay could impact plans to begin construction by late summer or early fall, with steps such as design, permitting, and procurement needing to be completed first.

The committee also examined the potential extension of the Route 6 water line to Dartmouth. Dartmouth, which currently relies on wells, expressed interest in accessing Westport’s water supply due to issues with high-cost purchases from New Bedford during peak demand periods. A member noted that by extending the water line 7,500 feet to the Dartmouth line, commercial properties along Route 6 could connect, and Westport could benefit from a transmission fee if Dartmouth purchases water from Fall River. However, concerns were raised about ensuring Westport’s interests are protected in any negotiations, as Dartmouth could gain leverage with New Bedford through this arrangement.

Further discussions centered on the infrastructure projects along Route 6, particularly the removal of the Whit’s curve and the excavation at Sanford Road. The state has approved the permits and blueprints for water line placement, but the current condition of Route 6—which has heaved approximately four inches—is causing safety concerns. Predictions suggest that the road could settle further, necessitating urgent repairs. The state has committed funds for the sewer system and storm drain installation, which will pave the way for road reconstruction once completed.

The committee also considered regional collaboration opportunities, exploring grants and state incentives to support infrastructure projects. The South Eastern Regional Planning and Economic Development District (SERPENT) was mentioned as a potential resource for technical assistance in drafting grant applications. With Steve Ouellette’s recent departure from the SERPENT board, identifying a replacement representative was noted as a priority.

Lastly, the committee discussed prioritizing funding requests. Westport recently secured a $4 million grant from the PAS program, the largest in the state last year, and is considering additional requests. Emphasis was placed on addressing engineering discussions and securing further funding to ensure the completion of essential infrastructure projects, with a focus on safety and functionality improvements for Route 6.