At the forefront of the meeting was the application from McDonald Construction LLC, represented by Brandon McDonald, seeking approval for the demolition and reconstruction of a single-family home at Hillcrest Acres. The applicant requested a finding that the new construction would not be substantially more detrimental to the neighborhood than the existing non-conforming use. The plan involved maintaining the existing footprint while adding a rear deck and adhering to flood zone compliance. A variance was also requested for the side yard setback, as the original footprint was only 3.2 feet from the property line, contrary to zoning bylaws.

The board engaged in a thorough analysis of the proposal, considering the implications of maintaining the non-conforming footprint. The applicant emphasized compliance with all current codes and standards, specifically flood zone regulations.

Board members questioned the necessity of the setback waiver and discussed potential drainage concerns. The discourse highlighted the benefits of keeping the same footprint to simplify the approval process and avoid further variances. The board also noted a trend in Westport of transforming old summer cottages into full-time residences, viewing this as a positive development for the town. Ultimately, the board unanimously approved the application, finding that the new structure would not be more detrimental to the neighborhood.

The meeting then transitioned to a continuation hearing for Pinebridge States LLC’s comprehensive permit application under Massachusetts General Law chapter 40B. This proposal involves developing 38 single-family homes, with ten designated as affordable. The board deliberated on whether to engage a consultant for the project and discussed two potential candidates. Concerns were raised about potential conflicts of interest, particularly with a firm owned by Brian Dunn, which had previously collaborated with board members on various developments.

Legal counsel clarified that hiring the firm did not present a legal issue as long as the consultant understood their role. Consequently, a motion was made to contract MBL Land Development as the consultant, contingent on confirming no conflict of interest existed. This motion passed with little opposition, and a $5,000 check was deposited into a 53G account to cover peer review costs.

A significant portion of the meeting was dedicated to the Westport Lakes subdivision, where environmental impacts and infrastructure maintenance were concerns. Reports from the Conservation Commission detailed complications arising from wetland alterations, requiring Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) approval due to the development’s location in a habitat for endangered species. The conversation revealed that the original approval allowed wetland alterations at two sites, but it was unclear if the proposed replication was completed. Maintenance issues concerning the subdivision’s stormwater systems and road safety were debated.

Attorneys representing the development insisted that the homeowners association (HOA) was responsible for road maintenance, though they acknowledged the legitimacy of concerns about incomplete infrastructure. Board members emphasized the importance of maintaining safety standards, particularly concerning the road’s condition and its impact on the proposed 40B housing development.

Further complicating the situation was the involvement of Brad Dean, whose role and responsibilities in the development were heavily scrutinized. Discrepancies in ownership and decision-making authority raised concerns among residents and board members. The debate illustrated significant tensions over disclosure and compliance, with participants calling for clarity on responsibilities and adherence to regulations.

The board committed to further review and obtaining necessary consultant reports, including a crucial traffic study expected in January.