One focus of the meeting was the discussion surrounding the potential adoption of a split tax rate for Whately. The board explored the economic consequences of such a decision, particularly its impact on small businesses and commercial property owners. Concerns were raised about the fairness of a split rate, noting that it could lead to higher tax burdens on commercial properties, which could, in turn, affect local businesses like “Yankee Candle” and other small vendors.

The board members shared differing views on the matter, with one participant suggesting that the decision should be data-driven to avoid debates within the community. The prevailing sentiment was to recommend maintaining a single tax rate without exemptions, arguing that this approach would ensure a fair distribution of tax responsibilities. To support their stance, the board underscored the necessity of properly documenting any recommendations, thus enabling the Select Board to make informed decisions based on reliable data.

In preparation for the upcoming classification hearing, scheduled for December 5, the board emphasized the need for thorough documentation and public engagement. The hearing is set to address whether Whately should maintain its current tax structure or adopt a new approach. The board expressed a desire to ensure that all relevant documents were prepared well in advance to facilitate transparency and allow for meaningful public participation.

During the meeting, the board also addressed Whately’s tax rates in comparison to neighboring towns in Franklin County. The conversation highlighted a significant disparity, with Whately’s commercial tax rate being notably lower than some neighboring areas, where the rate can be as high as 80%. This disparity brought about a discussion on the broader economic implications of commercial development in the region, citing examples like the new $5 million tennis center in Hadley, which might influence local tax dynamics.

Beyond the tax rate discussions, the board delved into the development of a mission statement. A draft was presented with a focus on “Equitable tax assessments” and “cost effectiveness” as core goals.” The board sought to create a unified focus for its efforts, emphasizing collaboration with other town departments and ensuring clear, concise communication of their objectives. The board also considered practical measures to increase their visibility in the community, such as the distribution of business cards and name tags for board members.

The session also addressed the topic of tax exemptions available to residents. The board discussed various options, including the state circuit breaker tax credit, exemptions for seniors, and benefits for veterans. The board noted that these exemptions are accessible online, encouraging residents to take advantage of them for potential tax relief.

The board’s deliberations extended to the topic of residential and commercial property assessments, acknowledging recent growth figures: 4% in residential assessments and a historical 8% growth in the previous year. The board recognized the need to ensure accurate categorization of properties for fair taxation, particularly in light of fluctuating property values.

As the meeting wrapped up, the board underscored the significance of the upcoming classification hearing and the necessity for public engagement in the decision-making process. The board did not move into an executive session.