The commission’s conversation about an engaging community event quickly gained traction, particularly around the unifying theme of maple sugar. This proposal seeks to involve diverse local entities, such as schools, the library, and youth organizations, in a collaborative celebration. The inspiration for this theme stems from the historical context of the Sugar Act of 1764, which restricted sugar imports from the Caribbean, sparking revolutionary sentiments and promoting self-sufficiency among the colonies. Maple sugar, therefore, is not only a nod to local tradition but also a representation of resistance and independence.

Members expressed enthusiasm for the maple sugar idea, noting its potential to attract families and engage a broad audience. One participant highlighted the joyful and inclusive nature of the theme, emphasizing its appeal with the statement, “there’s nobody that hates the idea of maple sugar… it just gives you this happy thought.” The proposed event would also incorporate educational elements, exploring historical layers such as Native American practices, the abolitionist movement, and current environmental issues linked to sugar production.

Acknowledging the need for funding, the commission discussed possible sources to support the event. A recently circulated grant notice was mentioned, although the application deadline had passed. However, there is optimism that future opportunities will arise to secure financial backing for the community gathering. The group aims to align their event proposal with grant requirements to maximize funding chances.

While the maple sugar theme was widely favored, other ideas, such as exploring historical communication methods, were also considered. This concept, although intriguing, was deemed less visually engaging compared to the tangible appeal of maple sugar. Ultimately, the commission agreed that the maple sugar theme presents a broad and versatile topic, suitable for educational outreach and capable of linking to other historical narratives, such as environmentalism and local agriculture.

As the meeting addressed the center school project, it was reported that the commission did not receive an anticipated state grant. Nevertheless, a $14,000 grant from The National Trust was secured for a feasibility study, requiring a 100% match. This study aims to explore optimal uses for the center school building, focusing on affordable housing units to enhance eligibility for future grant opportunities. The National Trust’s recognition of the building’s historical significance is expected to aid in obtaining preservation tax credits from the state.

The commission is gathering estimates for a necessary roof replacement, adhering to Secretary of the Interior standards, and a structural engineering report is pending due to contractor communication delays. Discussions about the church’s CPA grant for window restoration revealed ongoing work, with dual-pane glass installation underway and storm windows on order.

In addition to these updates, the commission considered the absence of an active housing committee following the resignation of its chair, Katherine Woit. This gap poses a challenge to advancing affordable housing initiatives. Strategies to recruit new members were discussed, including enhancing advertisement visibility through social media, local libraries, and town offices. The commission debated requesting a re-run of the advertisement in a more legible format in the local publication, The Scoop.

Finally, the commission reflected on the upcoming 250th anniversary celebration of Whately in 2026. Ideas for commemorative activities included focusing on the ongoing work of democracy through storytelling about local neighborhoods and histories. The potential for guest articles in The Scoop was suggested to highlight different neighborhoods over time.