The central discussion revolved around the fiscal year 2025 tax classification hearing. The presentation by the board of assessors highlighted several key financial projections and considerations, such as the estimated levy for the fiscal year set at approximately $5,011,397. The board members were faced with options including implementing a split tax rate to differentiate between residential and commercial properties, a residential exemption for non-owner-occupied properties, a small commercial exemption, and an open space exemption.

In their presentation, the assessors recommended maintaining a flat tax rate across both residential and commercial properties, a stance supported by the Finance Committee. This suggestion was also endorsed by local business owner James Ross, who emphasized the importance of maintaining a consistent tax rate to encourage economic growth within the town. Ross voiced concerns about the negative impact that increased taxes could have on businesses, stating, “we need to promote growth in this town.”

The board’s discussion revealed differing opinions on the potential benefits and drawbacks of a split tax rate. Some members expressed concerns about the fairness of the current tax system, particularly its impact on small businesses and residents on fixed incomes. There was a suggestion that a split tax rate could reduce residential tax bills, but this was countered by concerns that such a change might disproportionately benefit wealthier homeowners. One board member pointed out, “the richer you are and the bigger your house the bigger your savings would be on that.”

The complexities of the tax proposals led to some confusion among the board members. One participant remarked on the confusing nature of the figures presented, seeking clarification on the impacts of the proposed tax burden changes. The board ultimately decided to maintain the current residential factor at 1.0, effectively rejecting a split tax rate, with the vote passing with two members in favor and one opposing. The decision was also made not to adopt any of the proposed exemptions, with unanimous support for these motions.

In addition to tax matters, the board addressed committee appointments. Fred Orosi was appointed to the housing committee, and Joyce was selected for an ad hoc committee focused on energy storage systems. These appointments included representatives from various boards.

The meeting also tackled the renewal process for the Host Community Agreement (HCA) with Urban Grown, a cannabis business. Concerns were raised about the implications of granting waivers for HCAs, particularly the potential complications in future transactions involving the cannabis license. The board unanimously voted to deny the request for a waiver, emphasizing the need for consistency in the HCA process. A representative from Urban Grown acknowledged the board’s concerns and expressed a desire to engage further with the Cannabis Control Commission for clarification.

Environmental issues were also on the agenda, with discussions about the old landfill on Long Plane Road, closed since 1983. Recent regulatory changes necessitated monitoring due to nearby residences, prompting a site visit to determine the necessary remediation scope. The board discussed a proposed budget of $15,000 to $20,000 for this work, primarily for installing wells for gas and water sampling. A motion to approve the scope of work and submit it to the Department of Environmental Protection was unanimously supported, allowing the town to seek capital funding.