The board’s decision to retain the single tax rate was influenced by a presentation from Fred Rosski, Chairman of the Board of Assessors, who highlighted the potential risks associated with implementing a split tax rate. Rosski argued that penalizing commercial properties to benefit residential tax rates could harm relationships with taxpayers and negatively affect the local economy. He noted that commercial properties account for approximately 24% of the tax base, and increasing their tax burden could drive businesses away, diminishing the town’s tax base.

David Burgess, a regional assessor, provided an overview of property evaluations, showing that residential property values had risen by about 7%, while commercial and industrial values increased by approximately 10%. The maximum amount the town could spend this year was set at $6.5 million, with an excess capacity of over $1.1 million. Despite the potential for a residential tax rate decrease to $135, the board’s preference was to avoid creating resentment among commercial property owners.

During the public hearing, community members, including business owners, expressed their apprehensions about a split tax rate. Gary Clark, a local business owner, emphasized the importance of small businesses to the community, stating that high operational costs already posed challenges to profitability. JD Ross, another business owner, abstained from voting due to his commercial property ownership but stressed the significance of small businesses in driving the local economy. Concerns were raised about scrutinizing larger corporations like Yankee Candle, which have historically supported the town through donations and sponsorships.

The board unanimously voted to maintain a single tax rate and decided against adopting a small commercial exemption or an open space discount for fiscal year 2026. Additionally, no residential exemption was approved. The board acknowledged the value of community input during the hearing, with one individual expressing appreciation for the informative reports presented.

In another significant item, the board discussed the potential construction of a new facility for the Franklin County Technical School. A representative detailed the need for a new building due to issues with the existing electrical switch gear and plumbing systems, which have caused operational challenges. The estimated cost for a new facility, including both hard and soft costs, was approximately $246 million. The board was informed that the Massachusetts School Building Authority (MSBA) would not reimburse for renovations, necessitating consideration of new construction.

The discussion included the financial implications of a new building and the need for a district-wide vote on the proposal, expected in the fall of next year. The representative stressed the importance of designing a facility that aligns with the community’s values and provides practical skills for students, noting the school’s success in competitive grant acquisition and program development.

Additional topics addressed during the meeting included the renewal of the town’s participation in the Upper Pioneer Valley Veterans Service District, which was unanimously approved. The board also discussed a conflict of interest request concerning a zoning board matter, ultimately determining that the fire chief’s financial interests did not impact his professional responsibilities.

The meeting concluded with updates on library services, including the need for air conditioning repairs and the availability of funds for capital uses. The board received a letter of appreciation from the town of Amherst for mutual aid provided during an apartment fire and noted upcoming price changes from Comcast for TV packages and service fees.