One notable issue of the meeting was the approval of case number P2422, a request by Landmark Investments Inc. to amend PUD ordinance 89-04 for a property located on Havendale Boulevard. Senior Planner Heather Reuter presented the proposal, which aims to develop 100 multifamily residential units on a vacant portion of the 13.58-acre property. The property is currently designated as a primary mixed-use hub and contains a commercial shopping center. The amendment seeks to modernize the PUD, aligning it with current zoning standards and addressing the increasing demand for residential units in the area. This proposal is expected to decrease demands on water, sewer, and transportation infrastructure compared to the previously permitted commercial development.

During the public hearing, the applicant’s representative, Mark Wiy, emphasized the high-quality and economically competitive nature of the proposed housing, targeting essential workers like teachers and firefighters. However, multiple residents voiced their concerns. Glenn Newland questioned the accuracy of projected water demand figures, citing potential discrepancies in water capacity and demand. He stressed the importance of considering seasonal variations in rainfall and the implications of increased construction on local water resources. Traffic concerns were also prominent, with residents pointing to studies indicating high traffic capacity at nearby intersections and the potential for exacerbated congestion.

Adding to the infrastructure debate, other residents discussed the precarious nature of the area’s aquifers. One speaker highlighted the risks of deeper drilling, which could lead to environmental hazards such as sinkholes. Traffic issues were further underscored by personal anecdotes, including difficulties older residents face due to current traffic conditions.

Despite these concerns, the Planning Board approved the amendment by a majority vote after a motion was made and seconded.

Another topic was the proposal for a new child care facility led by Kimberly Leonti. The property, previously used as a preschool, had been vacant for over 180 days, necessitating a new application for a special use permit. Chris Young, the senior planner, explained that the existing infrastructure could support the proposed facility, which would have a minimal impact on traffic. Community members expressed strong support for the initiative, highlighting the shortage of child care options in Winter Haven. Residents shared personal stories of how Leonti’s program had positively impacted their families, emphasizing the importance of providing alternative educational options. The board unanimously approved the request.

In another case, the Planning Board considered V3 Haven Square retail LLC’s request to amend a PUD ordinance for a site west of US Highway 17 and east of the CSX railroad tracks. Heather Reuter presented the proposal, which aims to develop a primary retail anchor site along with two smaller outparcels, totaling 310,000 square feet of commercial space. The representative from V3 Capital, Trey Vic, expressed appreciation for the staff’s assistance in the development process. The board approved the request after a brief discussion.

The meeting also addressed TBBP Holdings LLC’s request to amend the future land use map and rezone a parcel from neighborhood support to neighborhood suburban. This change would allow for the development of 32 multifamily residential units on the 3.68-acre property. John Bandon, representing TBBP Holdings, highlighted the compatibility of the proposed changes with the surrounding area. The board approved the request unanimously.

Residents voiced concerns about amendments to the 2035 Future Land Use Map, particularly regarding the potential impacts on traffic and community dynamics. One resident emphasized the challenges parents face due to heavy traffic near Winter Haven High School. Questions were raised about whether the approval of a PUD would require further review by the city commission, to which it was clarified that if the Planning Commission recommended approval, the case would proceed to the city commission for final action.

Public comments revealed significant apprehension about traffic congestion and infrastructure issues. Betty Hoffman questioned whether the Planning Commission was prioritizing developers over citizens’ interests, pointing out the volume of planned developments and the lack of thorough investigations into traffic data. Other residents shared similar concerns, emphasizing the need for careful consideration of the cumulative impact of new developments on the community.

The board also approved an administrative request to amend the future land use map for 63 parcels along Martin Luther King Boulevard, changing the designation to “Primary Mixed Use Hub” to encourage revitalization and development along the corridor. Residents raised concerns about ongoing sewage issues, potential displacement of existing homes, and the environmental impact of increased commercial activity.