The decision to remove the public forum from the council meeting agenda sparked debate. A public hearing was held to discuss proposed changes to city code chapter 2, which involved reducing the number of committees and changing the monthly meeting day. The removal of the public forum was particularly contentious. Council members explained that residents would still have the opportunity to address the council, but only if they communicated their requests in advance. This change was intended to allow council members to research and address concerns more during meetings.

However, the removal of the public forum was met with strong opposition from residents. Mark Sandlan, a resident, voiced his objections, arguing that the council’s decision sent the wrong message to the community. He claimed it reinforced the perception that the council was not listening to its residents and criticized the removal as an elimination of a key opportunity for public input. Council members countered that the new structure would enable them to act on agenda items more efficiently, but the perception of being dismissive was a concern.

The public hearing highlighted the council’s goal of being more proactive by ensuring that agenda items were well-researched and prepared for discussion. While some residents might have urgent concerns, the council believed that many issues could be resolved through direct communication with city staff. Residents were encouraged to reach out via phone or email rather than relying solely on the public forum. Despite the council’s assurances, the discussion underscored the challenges of balancing efficiency with maintaining open lines of communication with the public.

In addition to the public forum debate, the council addressed financial matters, including Ordinance 20251 concerning utility rate adjustments. The ordinance detailed increases in utility rates, with Excel Energy’s rates rising by 10% and CenterPoint Energy by 6%. Within Winthrop, the electric rate would increase by 2.4%, while water rates would see a more substantial 15% increase. The storm sewer rate was also adjusted, reflecting efforts to address revenue shortfalls in the system. The council discussed the financial challenges faced by the water and sewer systems, emphasizing the need for substantial investments in infrastructure.

The meeting also touched upon resolutions related to council operations. One resolution involved updates to Charter 2, with discussions about maintaining both an open forum and an opportunity for citizens to be placed on the agenda. Another resolution amended the MMPA agency agreement, adjusting voting structures to enhance representation for larger cities. Additionally, mayoral appointments for various committees in 2025 were confirmed, with key members assigned to administration, utilities, and ambulance services.

Community service updates were also on the agenda, with the ambulance service reporting an increase in call volume and the acquisition of advanced equipment. The library’s phone service costs were scrutinized, with the council exploring more cost-effective options. The fire department’s activities were recapped, highlighting a need for additional personnel and training resources. Concerns were also raised about the ambulance billing company, Expert T Billing, prompting considerations for bringing billing in-house or finding a new provider.

The council dealt with a range of administrative and operational discussions, including preparations for DNR grants, street maintenance projects, and the acquisition of new transformers for the Public Works Department. The selection of colors for a new splash pad and preliminary designs for trails were reported by the Parks Committee.