Woodbridge School Board Faces Public Concerns Over Health Risks and Education Policies

The Woodbridge School Board meeting on February 20, 2025, centered on concerns regarding health issues at Colonia High School, the district’s educational policies, and safety measures.

17:10The most notable discussion revolved around potential health risks linked to Colonia High School. Michael Han, a lifelong resident, voiced concerns about a possible connection between environmental factors and increased brain cancer cases among students and staff. He questioned whether the district had adequately addressed these health concerns, referencing conversations he had heard about the issue being deemed a “dead issue” by the school district and township. He highlighted the number of cancer cases, including his cousin’s recent diagnosis, stressing the need for transparency and action.

In response, a board representative detailed past investigations conducted in collaboration with state health and environmental departments to identify environmental causes of primary brain tumors, such as ionizing radiation. These investigations had returned negative results for radiation. The representative assured that the incidence of brain tumors in Colonia fell within normal ranges when compared to national averages. They also acknowledged findings of PCBs and historic pesticides in soil samples near the school, prompting the development of a remediation plan in collaboration with environmental authorities, with hopes of completion within the summer or fall of the year. All related correspondence was made publicly accessible online to maintain community transparency.

31:53The meeting also addressed broader educational concerns, highlighted by Paul Lond’s comments on student proficiency. Lond expressed dissatisfaction with the district’s educational outcomes, citing that only 5.5% of 11th graders in Woodbridge met proficiency standards required for graduation, which was below the state average. He questioned the board’s strategies for addressing these deficiencies and whether there had been considerations for operating without federal mandates like the No Child Left Behind Act. Lond also touched on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives.

A board member clarified the proficiency data context, explaining that the students tested had not met high school proficiency standards on their first attempt, and emphasized there was room for growth before the school year ended.

The conversation highlighted societal issues affecting students, as Gerald Mago of the Dolores Turco Foundation linked the mental health struggles of young people to a lack of meaning and values in their lives. He advocated for schools to teach values and self-discipline, citing a “success sequence” that could potentially prevent poverty.

Security in schools was another focal point. Attendees raised concerns about whether adequate security measures, similar to those at the meeting venue, were in place in schools. The discussion included references to recent efforts to improve school security, such as upgrading cameras and phone systems and hiring security officers.

1:03:33The board president addressed public comments on district policies, particularly concerning gender identity and health education. Accusations of indoctrination and inappropriate curriculum content were met with a stern response, emphasizing that the district’s transgender policy is designed to protect student welfare and facilitate communication between students and parents. The board president reiterated the transparency of the policy, available on the district’s website, and defended the health curriculum as age-appropriate and focused on consent and choices, countering claims of inappropriate material.

Budgetary concerns and financial management also surfaced, with discussions on potential state funding cuts and their implications for the district. The board emphasized the need for careful financial planning, particularly regarding audits and the management of significant grants.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

Trending meetings
across the country: