The meeting’s most discussion revolved around the Madakis Utilization Committee’s proposed housing plans, which outline two scenarios: “moderate” and “elevated.” The “moderate” plan proposes 62 rental housing units designed to attract affordable housing developers, with features such as architectural compliance, 1.5 parking spots per unit, and eco-friendly designs. These units are slated for the southeast corner of the parcel. The inclusion of elevators in these buildings aims to accommodate residents with mobility challenges, making the plan financially viable for developers. The committee discussed the necessity of at least one three-story building to ensure elevator access.

The discourse extended to concerns about the limited number of affordable housing units, which range from 6 to 12, depending on the development plan chosen. The committee deliberated on the need to balance residential development with parking requirements and the preservation of natural spaces, particularly along Chickity Lane. The idea of clustering housing while maintaining a buffer from existing residential areas was explored, emphasizing the importance of careful planning to minimize resistance from local residents.

Attention then shifted to the potential for municipal employee rental units, which are seen as a means to attract and retain employees in essential fields such as fire, police, and public works. The committee underscored the need for town management of these units and suggested that recruitment could be supported through grants for additional staffing.

The meeting also addressed the economic feasibility of maintaining existing structures like the gym and auditorium, which are highly valued by the community. There was a consensus that rehabilitating these facilities might not be economically practical, with some members suggesting the town would need to subsidize efforts to retain them. The possibility of a capital improvement plan or an override to preserve these community assets was mentioned.

Another topic was the inclusion of renewable energy solutions in the housing projects. While the community is not LEED-certified, there is interest in ensuring buildings are “LEED ready.” Discussions about integrating solar panels, particularly on-site solar energy, were held, with considerations for balancing community preferences with project requirements. The town’s energy committee is seeking sustainable energy solutions, including the potential establishment of a solar panel farm on Workshop Road.

The meeting also touched on the role of Habitat for Humanity in the housing development process. Norine, a representative from Habitat for Humanity, discussed plans for six affordable homeownership units targeted at families earning 60% to 80% of the area median income. These units, located near the intersection of Wood Road and Route 28, are designed as ranches and capes. The project includes provisions for local and veteran preferences, with an emphasis on community sponsorship.

Fencing and landscaping were debated, particularly concerning traffic concerns on Route 28. The committee discussed the importance of balancing residents’ privacy with the visibility of housing from the road. Suggestions included a natural fence made of arborvitae to maintain a residential feel while ensuring the presence of housing is felt from the busy road.

The intricate dynamics of building design, accessibility, and community integration were central themes as committee members sought to refine their proposals.