Yarmouth Plans to Extend Short-Term Rental Bylaw Amid Community Debate

In a recent Yarmouth Planning Board meeting, the most pressing topic of discussion was the proposed amendment to the town’s zoning bylaw concerning short-term rentals, which has sparked a community-wide debate on its impact. The amendment aims to extend the expiration date of the sunset clause for Section 48, governing short-term rentals, from November 13, 2024, to November 30, 2026. This move is intended to allow the town to continue benefiting from short-term rental excise tax revenues, which are important for funding wastewater programs, while further studies on the effects of these rentals are underway.

The amendment was presented by town planner Kathy Williams, who explained the rationale behind the extension. Short-term rentals, defined as leasing a space for less than 31 days, have become a significant source of revenue for Yarmouth, with a 6% excise tax generating approximately $1.5 million in fiscal year 2023. Seventy-five percent of this revenue is earmarked for wastewater programs, highlighting the financial importance of short-term rentals for the town’s infrastructure.

The existing bylaw includes measures to maintain the character of residential neighborhoods, with specific focus on ineligible units, registration and inspection requirements, trash removal regulations, parking restrictions, and limitations on events and rentals. The Building Commissioner revealed that out of 1,303 short-term rental units, only 10 complaints had been logged, most of which were minor and quickly resolved. Moreover, the town hired a new housing inspector to help manage the increased workload associated with these rentals.

During the meeting, the public voiced their concerns and suggestions. One community member highlighted the detrimental effects of short-term rentals on their neighborhood, such as increased traffic and parking issues, and proposed the creation of a public database to track rental properties. Another, a short-term rental owner, outlined their strict rental policies and sought clarification on the regulations for hosting events like weddings and graduations. In response to these concerns, the Board referred to the case law of Styler vs. the ZBA of Lynfield, which underscored the necessity of codifying regulations.

The dialogue underscored a tension between the rights of short-term rental owners and the concerns of permanent residents. The Planning Board sought to navigate this divide by emphasizing the need for transparent permitting information and the capability to track complaints via the OpenGov system, as well as verifying registration and tax compliance through the state’s website.

There was also discussion about the $50,000 study commissioned to examine the relationship between seasonal and short-term rentals and the availability of year-round housing. The affordable housing trust will conduct the study, and its findings will be presented to relevant committees and the planning board, with potential public release and consideration for general bylaw changes.

In the broader context of town governance, the board deliberated on several other issues. They debated the need to regulate short-term rentals in light of state regulations and their potential impact on town revenue and wastewater plans. The board members expressed varying opinions on the necessity of regulation, with some questioning the need for changes and others advocating for the protection of both landlords and the community.

A notable discussion ensued on the definition of “large scale events” within the bylaw, addressing concerns over interpretation and the need for clear language. Examples of events held at rental properties and the challenges of enforcement were cited, highlighting the complexities involved in drafting effective regulations.

The board also addressed the separation of a construction project’s bid into two phases due to differing state laws governing horizontal and vertical construction. The first phase, involving site work, is scheduled to go out to bid shortly, with the hope that a separate bidding process for the restrooms will yield the best pricing for the town. Additionally, the board discussed the approval of the accessory apartment bylaw by the Attorney General’s office, cautioning the need to consider rental rights for families and potential future legislative changes.

Moreover, the Planning Board touched upon a meeting with Senator Sears’s office, focusing on water quality issues and grant opportunities for housing expansion. The potential impact of the new accessory dwelling unit bylaw on zoning meeting agendas was assessed, with several inquiries and at least one application already submitted.

Lastly, the need for a review of the zoning bylaws was brought up, with a suggestion for an annual revision process to correct outdated regulations. This was contextualized within the broader scope of the local comprehensive plan, which remains the board’s top priority. The meeting concluded with updates on the Cape Cod Commission’s economic summit and the development of a regional economic development strategy.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

Trending meetings
across the country: