The board’s decision to approve the Wake B Development petition was notable, as it had previously been denied, resulting in an appeal to the land court. The project, represented by attorney Christopher Karine, involved raising and replacing a non-conforming dwelling within its current footprint. The structure, described as being in poor condition, would be rebuilt without increasing non-conformities, addressing previous concerns about the proximity to groundwater by converting the basement to a crawl space.

During the meeting, board members inquired about the specifics of the new structure, including its height, which would not exceed the existing 22 feet, remaining below a distinctive windmill on the property. The existing septic system would continue to be used, as confirmed by a passing title five record from the health department.

The board opened the floor to public comments, where resident John Trudeau expressed concerns about the size of the proposed structure and its proximity to his family’s condo. He noted that while the footprint would remain the same, the structure would nearly double in size and increase in height to approximately 24 feet. Trudeau also raised issues about limited parking, with a maximum of four available spaces and no street parking due to the private street designation. The board chairman acknowledged Trudeau’s comments, noting the homeowners’ association had previously voted in favor of the proposal.

Despite public concerns, the board approved the petition, emphasizing the need for redevelopment and maintaining the character of the area. The board also discussed the withdrawal of the variance request without prejudice.

In another significant agenda item, the board reviewed a petition submitted by Timothy Kelly, operating under SMK Realty One LLC, for a property on Route 28. The application sought a special permit and/or variance for front and side setback relief. Kelly plans to restore the building, which had been dilapidated for eight years following fire damage, into a warehouse and small retail area for a pool supply store.

Parking emerged as a concern, with board members questioning whether the proposed configuration would suffice for the business model. Kelly maintained that customer traffic would be minimal, as sales primarily occurred at homeowners’ properties. He acknowledged the potential need for additional permits if retail operations expanded in the future.

The board discussed the building’s layout and parking configuration, considering the practicality of parallel parking and the implications of allowing multiple businesses within the building. They agreed that the property should be limited to a single business to avoid future complications, especially given the parking constraints.

The meeting also covered a petition from Dennis and Deborah Mason, who sought a variance to construct a sunroom and extend a deck on their property in Yarmouth Port. The Masons, accompanied by their architect, outlined the need for additional space due to a growing family. The board discussed the unique challenges of corner lots, ultimately supporting the project and approving the petition unanimously.