- MA
- Worcester County
- 7/30/25
- 07/31/2025
- 30 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: In a recent Gardner City Council meeting, members deliberated on several topics, including the impact of rising construction costs on city projects, the appointment of key city officials, and the intricate financial operations managed by the treasurer’s office.
- MA
- Worcester County
- 7/14/25
- 07/15/2025
- 32 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Gardner Conservation Commission meeting addressed several pressing conservation issues, with the safety concerns surrounding a partially collapsed culvert near the reservoir taking center stage. The commission’s attention was also drawn to ongoing issues at a sludge landfill site, unauthorized activities near wetland areas, and pending updates on various conservation projects.
- MA
- Worcester County
- 7/8/25
- 07/10/2025
- 27 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Gardner Planning Board convened on July 8th to approve a multifamily development on Emerald Drive and recommend a zoning map amendment, both of which were significant in shaping the city’s future development. The meeting also discussed an expansion for Mount Wus Community College’s automotive technology center and addressed procedural concerns about a parking variance.
- MA
- Worcester County
- 7/7/25
- 07/08/2025
- 49 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: In a recent meeting, the Gardner City Council discussed and approved a zoning amendment to facilitate business expansion, addressed a range of community projects, and tabled a proposal for a new senior center program pending further review.
- MA
- Worcester County
- 7/2/25
- 07/07/2025
- 36 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: During the recent Gardner Airport Commission meeting, a issue emerged regarding a typographical error in a grant agreement from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). The original agreement inaccurately stated that the FAA would cover 90% of the project costs instead of the correct 95%. This discrepancy raised concerns about the potential financial implications for the city. The individual addressing the commission emphasized the importance of clarity, stating that such a percentage difference represented a financial burden on the city. The commission noted the necessity of revising the grant agreement to reflect the correct funding percentage, with plans to prepare a contract with Gail Associates for the project work order once the revision was confirmed.