- NJ
- Middlesex County
- 8/26/25
- 08/27/2025
- 63 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The recent Woodbridge Township Council meeting focused on several issues, including amendments to local ordinances concerning e-bike regulations, discussions on affordable housing strategies, and various community concerns.
- NJ
- Middlesex County
- 8/12/25
- 08/13/2025
- 57 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The recent Woodbridge Township Council meeting addressed significant local issues, notably the approval of a major sewer infrastructure project and concerns over school overcrowding linked to high-density housing. Discussions also delved into public safety measures, including regulations on electric bicycles, and various community events were highlighted.
- NJ
- Middlesex County
- 7/22/25
- 07/23/2025
- 65 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Woodbridge Township Council recently convened to discuss various community initiatives, including a bond ordinance for the acquisition of properties in Sewaren aimed at preserving the waterfront. The meeting also featured student presentations on anti-vaping efforts and discussions on local infrastructure projects.
- NJ
- Middlesex County
- 6/30/25
- 07/02/2025
- 100 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Woodbridge Township Council meeting featured a captivating lecture by Maryanne at the Baron Art Center, focusing on early American history and art, alongside discussions on technological advancements and historical contributions from notable figures. The meeting also touched on the community’s cultural engagements and the economic impact of the Erie Canal.
- NJ
- Middlesex County
- 6/24/25
- 06/25/2025
- 45 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Woodbridge Township Council meeting was highlighted by the approval of a new grammar school for the Hope and Kisby communities, addressing a long-standing lack of educational infrastructure since a school closure in 1990. This decision was met with concerns regarding accessibility and community impact, sparking a discussion among council members and residents.