Union Zoning Board Approves Larger Signage for Burlington, Citing Safety and Aesthetic Benefits

Overview: In a recent meeting, the Union Zoning Board approved a variance for Burlington to replace its signage on Springfield Avenue, formerly occupied by Best Buy. The board unanimously supported the new sign, emphasizing its benefits for public safety and visual appeal.

Union County School Board Faces Criticism Over Transparency and Financial Decisions

Overview: The Union County School Board meeting was marked by public scrutiny over transparency, financial management, and the handling of educational resources and infrastructure. Community members voiced concerns over the board’s decisions, questioning the allocation of funds and the board’s responsiveness to parental input. Concerns about the district’s infrastructure, particularly at Hannah Caldwell School, and the handling of public meetings were also raised.

Union County Planning Board Approves New Crystal Restaurant, Addressing Traffic and Environmental Concerns

Overview: The Union County Planning Board has given the green light to the development of a new Crystal Restaurant on Route 22, where a former gas station stood. The approval came after in-depth discussions about traffic management, environmental considerations, and site design. The project aims to revitalize the vacant property while maintaining compliance with local regulations and addressing community concerns.

Union Zoning Board Approves Live-In Manager for Storage Facility Amid Fire Safety Concerns

Overview: The Union Zoning Board granted approval for a storage facility on Springfield Avenue to convert 12 storage units into a two-bedroom apartment for a live-in manager. This decision, which required both D1 and D2 use variances, addressed safety and operational concerns, including fire safety raised by a neighbor and the fire department.

Union County Commissioners Face Public Scrutiny Over $43 Million Clark Reservoir Project and Financial Concerns

Overview: In a recent Union County Board of Commissioners meeting, significant public concern was voiced over the $43 million Clark Reservoir project, budget modifications, and transparency in fiscal management. Residents questioned the decision to divert COVID-19 relief funds toward the reservoir project, highlighting unfulfilled promises of dredging and aeration and suggesting potential liabilities associated with boating facilities. Additionally, the discussion spotlighted financial decisions, such as an increase in legal service contracts and the issuance of solid waste bonds, raising alarms about the county’s financial stability.