ZIP Code
- Filters
- NJ
- Bergen County
- 2/10/25
- 02/10/2025
- 73 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: During a recent Ridgewood Council meeting, the discussion on environmental and community issues took center stage. Residents voiced strong concerns about the council’s plans for artificial turf installations, citing environmental and health implications. The meeting also covered community initiatives, proclamations, and updates on local projects, but the turf debate captured the most attention, highlighting divisions among council members and residents.
- NJ
- Bergen County
- 2/5/25
- 02/05/2025
- 83 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: During the recent Ridgewood Village Council meeting, discussions focused on the Shedler property development delays, financial management, and infrastructure improvements. Residents voiced concerns over the lack of progress on the community park plan, established in 2017, and discrepancies in financial allocations, while council members addressed various operational updates and public safety projects.
- NJ
- Bergen County
- 2/3/25
- 02/03/2025
- 218 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: During the Ridgewood Council meeting held on February 3, 2025, several critical budgetary concerns were addressed, highlighting an increase in cybersecurity measures, sanitation fees, and compliance costs related to water utility regulations.
- NJ
- Bergen County
- 1/29/25
- 01/29/2025
- 104 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Ridgewood Council meeting on January 29, 2025, was marked by discussions on the completion of a lighting project at Veterans Field and deliberations on the town’s affordable housing obligations. The council also addressed various community initiatives and the importance of constructive discourse among residents.
- NJ
- Bergen County
- 1/27/25
- 01/27/2025
- 184 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: At the recent Ridgewood School Board meeting, attention was given to a proposed funding arrangement for softball field lighting, sparking debate over budget priorities and transparency. The board approved a one-time payment of $80,000 for lighting enhancements at the softball field, securing priority facility access for the district’s teams for 20 years. However, this decision has led to questions about the allocation of funds and the board’s role in municipal projects.