- NJ
- Bergen County
- 9/29/25
- 09/29/2025
- 83 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: At the recent Glen Rock School Board meeting, the main focus was on addressing perceived inequities in coaching stipends for winter sports, a concern echoed by multiple community members. The meeting also covered topics such as bond refinancing, the integration of artificial intelligence in education, and a proposed amendment to extend sex education to high school.
- NJ
- Bergen County
- 8/25/25
- 08/25/2025
- 57 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Glen Rock School Board meeting delved into topics, including the New Jersey Graduation Proficiency Assessment (NJGPA) results, updates on international exchange programs, and facilities management. The board examined the implications of the NJGPA for the class of 2024, addressed community concerns regarding Dr. Brett Charleston’s engagement, and reviewed ongoing construction projects at district facilities.
- NJ
- Bergen County
- 8/19/25
- 08/19/2025
- 119 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: At the recent Glen Rock School Board meeting, discussions centered around the district’s strategic planning for educational goals, the financial challenges posed by escalating health insurance premiums, and the implications of artificial intelligence on the curriculum.
- NJ
- Bergen County
- 7/24/25
- 07/24/2025
- 10 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: At the latest Glen Rock School Board meeting, community members voiced strong concerns about declining academic performance and administrative accountability. During the public comment session, speakers expressed dissatisfaction with both the current state of the district and the perceived lack of oversight by the board.
- NJ
- Bergen County
- 7/1/25
- 07/01/2025
- 68 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The recent Glen Rock School Board meeting centered around a detailed evaluation of Superintendent Brett Charleston, revealing concerns regarding communication, collaboration, and the overall dynamic between the superintendent and the board. While Dr. Charleston received an overall rating of proficient, indicating he met expectations in areas like fiscal responsibility and curriculum instruction, the evaluation process highlighted critical areas for improvement, particularly in fostering mutual respect and trust with the board members.