- Filters
- NJ
- Monmouth County
- 3/2/26
- 03/03/2026
- 27 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: In a recent meeting of the Belmar Housing Authority, the body tackled a range of topics primarily focusing on the weatherization program and emergency preparedness. Discussions also covered maintenance issues, financial updates, and community engagement strategies.
- NJ
- Monmouth County
- 2/27/26
- 02/27/2026
- 38 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: In a recent Belmar Borough Council meeting, discussions focused on the implementation of mixed-use overlay zones in response to the borough’s affordable housing obligations and a controversial proposal for a four-story apartment complex on 4th Avenue. The council emphasized that these overlay zones are a preventative measure to avoid potential legal challenges and larger, less favorable developments. This meeting also featured discussions on local infrastructure, stormwater management, and community events.
- NJ
- Monmouth County
- 2/19/26
- 02/20/2026
- 92 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: In a recent Belmar Zoning Board meeting, discussions centered on various residential renovation applications, emphasizing compliance with zoning regulations, safety concerns, and maintaining neighborhood character. Notable approvals included a modern renovation for a longstanding family home at 207, a contentious driveway extension on 16th Avenue, and a renovation proposal requiring a variance for a pop-out addition.
- NJ
- Monmouth County
- 2/2/26
- 02/03/2026
- 79 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: In a recent Belmar Housing Authority meeting, concerns were raised regarding snow removal services and the lack of an emergency response plan, particularly for senior residents.
- NJ
- Monmouth County
- 1/22/26
- 01/23/2026
- 123 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Belmar Zoning Board meeting saw the approval of a variance for the Matthews family, allowing them to enhance their backyard with a pool, cabana, and additional structures, despite exceeding the maximum allowable building and impervious coverage. This decision came amid discussions on privacy concerns and the implications of impervious surface regulations in the community.