- Filters
- NJ
- Middlesex County
- 1/20/26
- 01/21/2026
- 99 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: During the Piscataway Township Council meeting on January 20, 2026, residents voiced strong concerns about safety issues related to the Motel 6, prompting council discussions on potential regulatory changes. The meeting also highlighted discussions on amendments to local zoning and traffic regulations, and the proclamation of Muslim Heritage Month.
- NJ
- Middlesex County
- 1/15/26
- 01/16/2026
- 53 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Piscataway Township Zoning Board tackled multiple applications during its recent meeting, approving a variety of zoning variances and property modifications that addressed unique challenges faced by local property owners. Notable approvals included a bulk variance for a longstanding garage, the reconstruction of a fire-damaged home, and conditions for a new property owner facing compliance issues.
- NJ
- Middlesex County
- 1/8/26
- 01/08/2026
- 139 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Piscataway School Board meeting centered on leadership changes, student-led initiatives, and educational improvements. Nancy Salgado-Cowan was sworn in as a board member and elected as board president. The meeting also highlighted student projects from Quivaltown Middle School, emphasizing hands-on engineering education, and discussed upcoming cultural events and community engagement efforts.
- NJ
- Middlesex County
- 1/1/26
- 01/03/2026
- 50 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Piscataway Township Council meeting focused on significant infrastructure funding, appointing new council leadership, and addressing resident concerns.
- NJ
- Middlesex County
- 12/16/25
- 12/17/2025
- 79 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Piscataway Township Council meeting on December 16, 2025, focused heavily on a proposed ordinance aiming to regulate noise levels and public safety, sparking debate among council members and residents. Discussions revealed deep concerns about the ordinance’s potential impact, specifically its provisions addressing noise from large gatherings and public nuisance regulations, which residents argued could unfairly penalize innocent community members and inadvertently criminalize those providing aid to the unhoused.