- Filters
- MN
- Dakota County
- 5/8/25
- 05/08/2025
- 21 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: At the recent Lakeville Planning Commission meeting, the commission approved an interim use permit for South Metro Safe and Vault to allow the outdoor display and sale of safes in the C3 General Commercial District. The meeting also addressed the preliminary plat approval for Heritage Commons 9th Edition and concluded with the election of new officers for the commission.
- MN
- Dakota County
- 5/5/25
- 05/05/2025
- 108 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Lakeville Area School Board meeting addressed challenges related to student enrollment growth, boundary adjustments, and the impact of new housing developments on school capacities. A strategic focus was placed on managing these issues effectively while ensuring minimal disruption to students and families.
- MN
- Scott County
- 5/5/25
- 05/06/2025
- 114 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: In a recent meeting, the Prior Lake-Savage Area School Board tackled a spectrum of issues, ranging from budget constraints and potential school closures to the impact of new cell phone policies and the importance of student voices in policy decisions.
- MN
- Dakota County
- 5/5/25
- 05/06/2025
- 31 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: At the latest Lakeville City Council meeting, residents expressed concerns about disturbances around a local pond, prompting requests for new signage to mitigate issues. The council also addressed proclamations for community initiatives and received updates from the police department.
- MN
- Dakota County
- 5/1/25
- 05/01/2025
- 86 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Burnsville-Eagan-Savage School Board, during its special meeting, focused on the selection process for the district’s new superintendent, culminating in the decision to advance three candidates—Tyrone Brookens, Latana Daniels, and Becky Broadier—to second-round interviews. The discussions were marked by a detailed evaluation of the candidates’ strengths and a commitment to a transparent and fair selection process, as evidenced by the board’s debate over interview formats and question selection.