The primary focus of the meeting was the proposed zoning amendments aimed to facilitate multifamily housing development while maintaining the town’s character. The zoning proposal included regulations on size, height, setbacks, parking, affordability, and design standards for multifamily units. The board emphasized the need to avoid transforming commercial areas, like the historic downtown, into residential zones.

Public input was strongly encouraged, with residents voicing concerns about the potential impact of new developments on traffic, parking, and community aesthetics. One resident, Lauren Bunker, questioned the implications for parking and traffic if a developer constructed 25 units next to her property. Another resident, Sandy Rogers, sought clarity on how the 3A law would affect existing condominium bylaws, prompting a response that local zoning laws would not interfere with private contract rights.

Discussion also centered on the financial analysis of the proposed developments. The Finance Committee reviewed reports estimating that the town could feasibly add 34 units in certain areas and an additional 100 units at a designated location. The committee calculated potential tax revenue from new housing units, assessing the financial impact on the town’s infrastructure and services, including water and sewer capacity. It was noted that the Department of Public Works had sufficient capacity to support new developments, with the select board setting rates to cover expenses.

The board also addressed the implications of the Housing Choice Act and the MBTA 3A provisions, which allow certain zoning changes to be adopted by a simple majority vote. Concerns were raised about the potential need for a two-thirds majority if special permits for accessory uses were retained. The board considered removing special permit requirements to simplify the zoning process.

As the meeting progressed, the board discussed the necessity of enforcing zoning bylaw criteria, such as earth removal and flood control, through site plan approval. Public comments highlighted the importance of transparency and effective communication with residents, particularly regarding changes that could impact neighborhood dynamics. The board acknowledged the need for clear notifications about zoning changes and public hearings to ensure residents are informed and engaged.