The pool project took center stage during the meeting, with board members and community participants deliberating on both financial and logistical aspects. The project’s budget is set at $4.6 million, and although fundraising has been robust, with donations hitting a milestone of over half a million dollars, the board recognized the necessity of ongoing community involvement and contributions, particularly from local businesses. The fundraising committee highlighted their efforts in engaging larger corporations, though progress had been somewhat slow.

Discussions revealed some confusion regarding the pool’s design process. A participant noted that they assumed the design was finalized before the referendum, referencing past iterations reviewed by the board. However, it was clarified that while phase one was conceptual, the current phase involved developing plans for state submission. This includes addressing structural soundness with a geotechnical report indicating manageable soil conditions. The conversation also touched on the practical implications of maintaining grassy areas around the pool, with participants weighing in on potential cleanliness issues.

Design proposals for the new pool include a diving board, climbing wall, and spray features for children, with distinct zones for different activities. The board addressed the layout and future expansion possibilities, such as adding a larger slide contingent on further fundraising success. Shade structures are a key design element, with three planned to protect children from sun exposure.

The meeting also covered the demolition of existing structures on the site, including the bathhouse and mechanical room. Participants discussed the potential for coordinating these efforts to maximize resource efficiency. As the board navigates these logistical challenges, they are keen to maintain clear communication and collaboration among all involved parties.

In addition to the pool project, the board considered other park improvements. A notable topic was the redesign of the Covered Bridge Park sign, which has deteriorated significantly. There was debate over whether to maintain uniformity in park signage or allow for unique branding reflective of the park’s status as a town attraction. Although opinions varied, there was a consensus on the need for a refreshed sign design.

The board also approved a budget for dugout fencing materials, totaling approximately $3,382 for four dugouts, with a motion to round the budget to $4,000 for unforeseen expenses.

In a lighter moment, the discussion on dugout fencing included humor, with comparisons made between soccer nets and baseball fencing. This light-hearted exchange underscored the community’s enthusiasm for sports and recreational activities.

The introduction of new campground rules and agreements was another key topic, with discussions focusing on clarity and responsibility, particularly regarding liability. Ensuring that campground hosts receive copies of these agreements was seen as crucial for transparency.

Public engagement was further illustrated by Greg Mort’s presentation on the ZRO Business Children’s Fair, an initiative aimed at nurturing entrepreneurial skills among children. Mort requested assistance from the board in finalizing a venue and date at Cover Bridge Park, with an emphasis on minimizing costs for participants. The board expressed enthusiasm for the event and a willingness to assist, while also cautioning about potential traffic issues due to concurrent soccer events.

Although trail integration has been discussed previously, progress has yet to be made. The board noted inquiries from signage consultants about trail markers, but no decisions have been finalized.

The discussion on park signage extended to smaller neighborhood parks, which currently lack official markers. The board recognized that residents might expect similar signage for their local parks, and this was noted as an area for potential improvement.