A primary focus of the meeting was the community pool project, which is set to be rebid in early January due to concerns that certain aspects were over-designed. The board aims to have construction completed by spring 2027, with confidence expressed about meeting budget requirements during the rebidding process. Notably, the fundraising efforts for the pool project have been robust, with contributions from local organizations such as the Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW), which pledged $10,000. This contribution was made even before ticket sales for a related event reached the break-even point. The total amount raised during the fundraising campaign was approximately $13,000. The event featured a silent auction that raised about $1,500, along with other donations. A participant notably chose to donate $250 without claiming auction items, further boosting the fundraising total.

The board discussed potential changes to the construction plans, specifically considering the cost implications of reducing the thickness of the concrete slab from 6 inches to 4 inches. This change could result in cost savings, and there was also a proposal to use alternative, less expensive materials. The timeline for bids was originally tight, deterring some contractors, so the board suggested extending the timeline with a completion date set for 2027, which could attract more bids. Discussions also covered the allocation of funds, particularly the need to balance a previously earmarked $100,000 annually for operating expenses with contributions to the pool construction budget.

Further concerns were raised about the long-term durability of construction materials, especially the proposed switch from brick to wood framing for the mechanical and bathhouse structures. There was apprehension about public perception, as replacing a brick structure with wood might be viewed unfavorably. The board reached a consensus that any materials used should come with significant warranties to ensure they withstand environmental conditions and usage. The discussions drew on past experiences with similar projects, emphasizing the need for durability and sustainability.

In other business, the board discussed the applications of two potential new members, Carol Schuman and Victoria Lauren Perez, with the possibility of serving on multiple boards, as Victoria had also applied for the Economic Development Authority. The board agreed to recommend these applications to the council, which would then reach out to confirm the applicants’ interest in joining.

The renewal of the Greater Minnesota Parks and Trails membership was addressed, with the board recognizing the benefits of continued membership, particularly for upcoming grant opportunities. Despite some questions about possible funding overlaps for the Pioneer Trail and Cover Bridge Park, the board agreed to renew the membership at a fee of $175.

The board also reviewed the campground fee schedule, deciding against raising fees for the upcoming year. Current rates, including $1,430 for seasonal campsites, $25 for primitive sites, $40 for sites with electrical water, and $50 for sites with electrical water and sewer, were deemed appropriate. A non-guest waste station fee of $15 was also considered reasonable. The decision to maintain the existing fee structure was influenced by the incomplete bathhouse and non-functional pool.

Before concluding, the meeting touched on future capital planning discussions scheduled for February, aimed at creating a 10-year projection for park developments and funding allocations. A board member reflected on their six-year tenure, emphasizing the importance of sustained financial backing for projects and the need for community engagement in fundraising efforts for facility improvements. They noted the necessity of earmarking funds for timely project execution and stressed the importance of enhancing public outreach and communication regarding the board’s activities.