During the meeting, the council delved into a variety of issues, but public safety took a central stage when resident Kathy Barowitz brought up the problem of non-functioning streetlights on Gand Drive. This area, lacking proper illumination since October, was said to pose safety risks, particularly given its proximity to local marinas. Barowitz expressed her frustration, reporting that despite contacting JCP&L and providing pole numbers, the problem persisted. She also highlighted the unclean state of Route 35, citing litter and overgrown grass that contributed to a decline in the area’s appeal.

The council’s response to Barowitz’s concerns was prompt, assuring her that the pole numbers would be forwarded to JCP&L for action. They acknowledged the gravity of the safety issues and the need for immediate resolution, not shying away from the possibility of escalating the matter to higher authorities to ensure timely intervention.

Environmental stewardship also featured prominently. The council and attendees showed their appreciation for the recycling coordinator’s dedication, which included the promotion of the Recycle Coach app designed to improve recycling efficiency and an announcement about an Earth Day event and a paper shredding event scheduled for April 27th. Acknowledging the benefits of trees and local woodlands, the council proclaimed Arbor Day, emphasizing the community’s role in supporting environmental protection efforts. This was complemented by the environmental shoutout initiative, recognizing local businesses for their sustainability endeavors.

Amid the environmental accolades, the council also tackled legislative and administrative matters. They discussed various ordinances, notably those related to stormwater management and recreation fees. Appointments were made to the Recreation Board and the Cultural Arts Council.

The meeting took a contentious turn during the public comments segment. Beyond the streetlight and cleanliness issues, residents expressed dissatisfaction with the shared services agreement with the Sayreville Economic Redevelopment Agency and the benefits agreement with the Middlesex County Utilities Authority (MCUA). One resident questioned the long-term agreement with the MCUA, which entailed a 0% increase in host benefits and a fixed rate for 30 years, raising concerns about the fairness and future impact of such terms.

Another resident’s concerns about the MCUA’s impact on the Riverton area were voiced. Additionally, there was debate over a financial agreement with Parlin Section One Urban Renewal LLC, and the council decided to pull one resolution for further review. Despite this, the adoption of the remaining consent agenda items proceeded, with some dissent noted among council members on specific resolutions.

Public spaces and their upkeep were another focal point. Residents pointed to the need for more littering fines and greater efforts to maintain public spaces like Kennedy Park. The Veterans Preference in affordable housing was another topic of concern, with residents expressing disappointment that the preference was not being extended to low- and moderate-income veterans as was purportedly intended.

Transparency and governance also came under scrutiny. A long-time resident accused the council of secretive and corrupt practices, challenging the council’s openness and accountability.