The discussion extended to the broader implications of the redevelopment, considering the proposal’s alignment with county requirements for the right of way along Mount Ay Road. The board confirmed no physical improvements were mandated by the county, with no additional right of way requested by the New Jersey Department of Transportation. The board also contemplated the addition of street trees, storm water management issues, and modifications to the parking garage, including the provision of a curb along the ramp.

Another crucial aspect of the redevelopment involved the parking situation. The board delved into calculations for accommodating various tenant types, especially restaurants, and how these align with the Redevelopment plan. The architect was tasked with managing the details of the parking garage’s interface with commercial spaces.

The architectural and civil aspects of the proposed development were also a focal point of the discussion. Board members evaluated the site’s lighting design, emphasizing the need for architectural accent lights and pedestrian illumination to ensure a safe environment at night. Concerns were raised about potential glare from courtyard lighting and the design and lighting of stairs leading from Mount Ary to the Courtyard. The board also reviewed letters received from professionals regarding traffic, storm water management, ADA compliance, and wall design.

During the meeting, the board addressed concerns regarding the underground garages and the potential impact on water runoff, including the quality of runoff and the filtration of water from cars in the garages. Discussions also touched on the number of parking spots provided, the building’s height, and its potential effect on wind and noise corridors. The need for detailed emergency plans, particularly regarding fire safety, was agreed upon as a topic for further discussion.

The meeting welcomed input from the public, with individuals raising several concerns about the proposed development. Questions were posed about the private nature of the proposed interior courtyard, the commercial square footage, parking, and sidewalk dimensions. Safety issues related to the proximity of a residential unit to a cell tower, the tightness of the area for cyclists, and the use of pesticides in the courtyard were also brought forward. The public’s inquiries highlighted the need for thorough consideration of the development’s impact on community safety and accessibility.