The meeting commenced with the discussion of a petition by Eversource Energy to install a new utility pole within Carolina Avenue in West Roxbury, intended to support the upgrade of antenna equipment by Crown Castle. Concerns were raised regarding the impact this installation could have on accessibility, especially for wheelchair users. The need for further coordination and the exploration of alternative solutions resulted in the decision to continue the hearing at a later date.

Subsequently, the meeting agenda moved to consider Verizon New England’s petition to install three new 40-foot private utility poles in Roxbury. The proposed installation prompted a debate over the impact on sidewalk space, accessibility, and the preservation of a mature tree. Notably, a Skyler Street resident, supported by a petition from neighbors, voiced strong objections to the placement of the poles and the overhead wiring. The resident highlighted concerns over accessibility, safety for the elderly population, and the mixed messages from Verizon regarding pole placement. The resident urged the consideration of underground services as an alternative.

During the proceedings, the Public Improvement Commission and the residents requested detailed diagrams that would demonstrate the infield conditions and potential “pinch points” created by the new poles. The Verizon representative acknowledged these concerns and the need for alternative engineering designs. The commission suggested that Verizon withdraw the petition or explore alternative options.

The continued petition offered Verizon the opportunity to revisit its proposals and seek solutions that would be more acceptable to the community.

The discussion of Cambridge Network Solutions’ proposal to lease a city shadow conduit for a cable TV system in Brighton contrasted with the contentious utility pole hearings. This proposal did not face any objections from the commission or the public, signaling that the project was more aligned with city and community expectations. The commission scheduled a public hearing for the proposal, which marked a smooth transition in the meeting’s agenda.

The meeting concluded with a standard motion to adjourn, pending further developments on the discussed issues. The commission’s responsiveness to community concerns and its insistence on reviews of proposed changes highlight a commitment to public engagement and thoughtful urban development.